Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts

Friday, July 25, 2025

Christmas in July? Bah, humbug!

 

It has been yet another busy, crazy, scary month on what one of my favorite online wits, Jeff Tiedrich, likes to describe as the stupidest possible timeline in the dumbest country, but Real Life has occupied much of my time this month once again, taking me away from my blogging duties. And now the month is almost gone.

But I did want to make a passing mention of a few items. First up is the sad occasion that I've covered on this blog every year since 2010: the anniversary of the death of
Colleen Conaway, a faithful follower of a sociopathic huckster named James Arthur Ray, at one of Ray's live events in San Diego. This is the 16th anniversary of Colleen's death on July 25, 2009. (Here is more information, from my 10-year anniversary post.)

Ray was never charged or convicted for his part in Colleen's passing, although he was charged, convicted, and served (far too little) time for the deaths of three more followers -- Kirby Brown, Liz Neuman, and James Shore -- who died as a result of participating in his marathon "sweat lodge" torture session in Sedona, Arizona in October of 2009.

All of this might seem mostly moot now that
Ray himself has passed away; as reported here, he died in January of this year. He can do no more damage. And after I write my annual post in October, I may very well retire my own yearly observations of the deaths of people at Ray's live events.

But I don't want anyone to ever forget about these people, nor do I want them to forget that while Ray is gone, others will almost certainly rise up in his place, to deceive and possibly harm new generations of followers. This is true of the New-Wage/selfish-help/McSpirituality industries, as well as fringe religious organizations, as well as political groups; due to the very human desire for leaders and heroes and saviors,
cults -- and charismatic, cult-like "leaders" -- remain a danger and probably always will.

(Many would contend that
MAGA is a cult, though some would argue that it's not quite a cult... but in any case, the devotion heaped upon Cheeto Jeezus has had an enormous impact on the US and arguably on other countries as well, and there seems to be a growing sentiment that this impact has been overwhelmingly terrible.)

* * * * *

July 25 is also a sad day for me personally because it would have been the birthday of my only sister, who died in March 2024, as a result of health problems that were poorly managed because of our broken f-----g health care system. It was on his own birthday last year that my brother -- and the police -- found her in her home. She had been gone for some time. I'll leave it at that.

And yesterday, July 24, was the five-month anniversary of the death of my husband,
Ron Kaye. I'm still reeling from that, and still trying to process the years-long nightmare of his illness, while tending to dozens of practical details, most notably finances.

There is a long tradition of informally celebrating
"Christmas in July." For me, this month has been, for the most part, the opposite of a reason to celebrate, both on a personal and political basis. Still, I look forward to better times ahead. I haven't entirely given up hope, especially now that it seems MAGA is finally splintering over the Epstein scandal and other matters. And besides, this blog's 19th (!) birthday is coming up on July 27. So I'm just going to keep on keeping on, and I hope you will too.

Before you leave...
While money cannot make some nightmares go away, be they political or personal, it can make them far easier to bear. With my husband Ron's passing in February 2025, I have experienced significant income loss and am scrambling to find more work, but in an industry increasingly being taken over by AI, it has been a challenge. Now more than ever, donations are urgently needed and profoundly appreciated. Here are some ways to do it:

  • New: Venmo -- username @Connie-Schmidt-42. Here is a direct link to the Venmo page.
  • New: PayPal -- Here is a direct link to my PayPal page.
  • Old but still good: You can click on the "Donate" icon that currently appears on the right-hand side of every page of this blog on the Web version. There's also a donation link at the end of many of my older blog posts. In the case of both the icon and the links on the older posts, as well as the link in this sentence, this is also a PayPal link, but it references the email account RevRon -- which is cool, because it all ultimately goes to the same place.

NOTE: If you are donating by PayPal, please specify that your contribution is for "friends and family," which will waive PayPal's substantial transaction fee.

Whether you can donate or not, thank you for visiting this Whirled.

 

Tuesday, November 05, 2024

Election Day musings: overall the US is actually better off than it was 4 years ago, but will be much WORSE off if 45 becomes 47

We are in the waning hours of Election Day in the Divided States of America, and it's no exaggeration to say that if American democracy has any hope whatsoever of surviving, Kamala will be our Number 47. Unfortunately, if we're to believe the polls and the pundits (and there are reasons to be skeptical of both, but we can't ignore them), Dolt 45 has an alarmingly good chance of winning -- and then there goes the country, and along with it much of the rest of the free world.

And I think most of us also know that when all is said and done, even if Kamala were to score what in a sane 
political milieu would be considered a landslide victory, the vicious and well-organized MAGA forces will do everything in their power, both inside and outside of the law, to overturn the will of the American people. So we need to brace ourselves for the possibility that January 6, 2021, was just a rehearsal.

"Are you better off now?"
One of the constant themes of the Trump campaign has centered around the loaded question, first posed by the late Ronald Reagan during the 1980 presidential debate with Jimmy Carter: "Are you better off than you were four years ago?" Of course the MAGA faithful have shouted that they are not, not, NOT better off, citing soaring food prices, expensive gas, imaginary "open borders," and an equally imaginary violent crime tsunami as evidence that the Biden/Harris administration has brought the country to ruin. The devotees fondly recall the halcyon daze of the first Trump reign, when food and gas were cheap, the border was totally secure, and law and order prevailed.

Accordingly they long for the Second Coming of their Cheeto Jeezus, who, they imagine, will swoop in and fix every aspect of the deep national malaise, because of course, he alone can fix it. I can't help but think about the
rooftop party scene in the 1996 movie Independence Day; that scene, as I've mentioned before, is the perfect metaphor for hopeful Trump supporters, who should in reality be very careful what they wish for. They may think he's a known quantity, but they could be in for some very unpleasant surprises under the Trump 2.0 operating system.

Meanwhile, people with a much less cloudy rear view mirror counter the "we were better off four years ago" mantra with fond memories of makeshift mortuaries and big trucks stacked with the bodies of COVID victims, endless lines at food banks, and bitter battles over toilet paper and hand sanitizer. Good times, good times.

MAGA cognitive bias has driven this election
I believe that apart from their abject worship of their orange god, there are two forms of cognitive bias that make MAGAs so disconnected from reality -- causing them to believe that things are horrific now but were a virtual paradise under Trump, and will be again upon his Second Coming. These biases have been cynically and relentlessly fueled by Trump's increasingly unhinged rhetoric and republican messaging in general.

1. Negativity bias
Granted, a majority of Americans report feeling "worse off" than they were four years ago, at least from the perspective of personal well-being, which seems to be guided by their perception of the US economy. This is according to
a September 2024 Gallup poll, the results of which were posted on the Gallup site on October 18, 2024. But, but, but...

The higher-than-usual percentage of U.S. adults who say they are worse off this year is largely owing to Republicans’ much greater likelihood to say this than opponents of the incumbent president’s party had been in prior election years. Likewise, the higher-than-usual percentage of “better off” responses in 2020, when Donald Trump was in office, was attributable to Republicans’ much greater likelihood to give that response than supporters of the incumbent president’s party did in prior election years.

So there's that. In any case, Americans' general lack of economic confidence is at odds with the fact that the economy is actually booming. And it is this lack of confidence that appears to be one of the main reasons Trump supporters give for being Trump supporters.

It's not just the economy with the MAGAs, of course. Larger culture-war issues are a big factor too, and there again the negativity bias really comes through, with Trumpists blaming Biden/Harris for what they see as the disintegration of decent society into an immoral, godless hellscape. The trans folks are taking over our schools, forcibly gender-affirming our innocent children and destroying school sports! The brown and black criminals are flooding into the country from prisons all over the world, and occupying our beautiful cities! They're eating the cats and dogs! And it's all Kamala Harris' fault!

Yesterday, on a shuttle bus on my way back home from visiting my husband at the VA hospital in Houston, I had an extended conversation with three male veterans ranging in age from mid-60s to early 80s. The four of us were getting along famously, sharing an amiable exchange about this and that. I am proud to say that even after the conversation turned, perhaps inevitably, to politics, it remained amiable -- no doubt because I kept my mouth shut at crucial moments during the exchange.

I hasten to say that I have nothing but respect for these men, who served their country willingly and are now receiving well-earned treatment for various medical conditions, some of which are service-connected. They deserve every benefit they receive, and so much more. (Unfortunately there's a very good chance that under Trump reign they will lose many or in some cases most of those benefits.)

Our gabfest took a political turn when one of the guys mentioned that the next day was going to be Election Day. Another one asked the rest of us if we'd voted yet, and we all said yes, we'd taken advantage of early voting. Having been privy to previous political conversations on the VA bus, I was kind of hoping that the conversation would end there, but no: one of the men said something about hoping that it would be a free and fair election, but that he had his doubts because of all of the "illegals" who were presumably being allowed to vote. The other guys expressed their agreement, and then they seemed to be waiting for me to say something.

I decided it best to remain as neutral as possible, so I said, "No matter what the results are and how clear they seem to be, there are going to be people who dispute those results. I only hope it doesn't get too ugly. I think that above all, we should all be hoping and praying for peace." (Being a devout agnostic, I'm normally not a praying person myself, but they all seemed to be, and I'm not above playing to the room if it doesn't go against my deepest held beliefs, or lack thereof. Apparently I hit the right note, because they all nodded in agreement with my statement.)

That would have been a fine ending to the conversation, but... no. One of the men said, "I think ABOVE ALL, we need to return this country to being one nation, UNDER GOD, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The other two nodded vigorously in agreement and one of them piped up, "And it definitely HASN'T been that for the past four years."

And then they were off and running, talking about how awful the economy is because egg and meat prices are so high and whatnot, and how dire the border situation is. Their consensus was that the most important issues in this election are the border and the economy. They were having a fine time griping about Democratic policies, laughing bitterly about things such as the Green New Deal, the proposed banning of gas stoves, and, of course, sky-high food and gas prices, all of which are apparently part of a demonic Democratic plot to destroy the republic.

One man said that the Democrats even want to impose high taxes or fines on cow farts, a reference to the decades-long controversy over methane emissions, which are considered to be a big contributor to the climate crisis. Of course the guys all guffawed about this, but I remained silent, not pointing out that
they were drawing on a distorted and over-simplified narrative, and that Congress has consistently blocked methane reporting regulations for years and years (and you can't tax or fine what isn't reported). Moreover, there is bipartisan support for legislation that encourages ranchers and farmers to voluntarily measure and report methane emissions. Plus there's ongoing research to find ways to reduce the cow-fart problem.

The conversation went on for a while in that vein, with the three vets riffing on how awful America had become during the last four years because of Democratic policies. And I stayed quiet for the most part. Why? To keep the peace, of course. It would have served no purpose to express my strongly dissenting opinions, especially since all of the men had already cast their votes.

But clearly, my new friends were suffering from negativity bias.

2. Euphoric recall
The other form of cognitive bias that seems to guide the MAGA mindset is something known as euphoric recall, which as a newly recovering alcoholic decades ago, I was warned could lead to relapse. Euphoric recall in the recovery context refers to a tendency, brought on by time and distance, to recall only the good things about one's drinking or drugging days, while glossing over the bad.

I took the warning to heart. I wasn't much of a praying person back then, either, but I clearly remember offering up a prayer to the Great Whatever, saying, "Please, no matter what happens, never, ever let me forget how bad it was." I wanted never to forget the horrible hangovers I had every day, that felt like a combination of jet lag and flu. I wanted never to forget the social gatherings that were ruined because of my drinking myself nearly into oblivion. I wanted never to forget the few times I might have come close to seriously or perhaps even fatally overdosing on alcohol, and was saved only by the intervention of caring friends.

And indeed, I never forgot any of that. I guess the prayer worked, because I'm still sober today.

Every one of us is prone to euphoric recall, because that's just the way our brains are wired. But MAGAts' euphoric recall, coupled with their negativity bias, could very well push our country over the edge.

My brother told me about a guy he recently met and with whom he'd struck up a conversation about a mutual friend of theirs. My brother, who is emphatically not a Trumper, mentioned to the guy that their mutual friend is. Well, it turned out that my brother's new acquaintance is also a Trumper. In trying to make his case for his support, all the guy could come up with was that gas was cheaper under Trump.

I've noticed that is a common refrain from Trumpists. But their memories are a bit distorted.
A July 2024 piece on the Forbes site takes a closer and much more realistic look at this issue.

There are reasonable explanations for the movements of gasoline prices over the past 30 years. Few of those movements involve actions taken by a president...

...Although Trump is often credited with low gasoline prices, the average price during Trump’s first three years in office was higher than during Obama’s last two years in office. But this isn’t the general impression people seem to have. One shouldn’t read too much into this, as there were macro factors – like strong global demand – putting upward pressure on prices
...

...Some fondly recall $2.00/gallon of gasoline, but they forget that it’s because there was little demand for gasoline since most people stopped traveling
[because of the COVID pandemic]. To the extent you give credit to Trump for low gasoline prices, you would need to account for which actions of his caused gasoline prices to fall. The stay-at-home orders? Yes, if you want to credit him for that, this was a major factor in the drop in gasoline prices.

But as soon as those orders ended, gasoline prices began to climb. In the last eight months of Trump’s presidency — following the decline to $2.00/gallon, gasoline prices climbed nearly 25%. The increase that began in the summer of 2020 continued throughout 2021.

Biden’s energy policies didn’t help, but supply chain disruptions made the biggest impact on gasoline prices during Biden’s presidency. (For a thorough comparison of the energy policies of President Trump and President Biden, see
this month’s cover story in Shale Magazine).

The truth is that gasoline prices did fall sharply during the last year of Trump’s presidency. But that drop happened because of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, prices had begun to steeply climb before Trump left office in January 2021. Thus, those who credit President Trump’s energy policies for the drop in gasoline prices are presenting a misleading picture at best.

Indeed.

So much is at stake
There are of course many other domestic issues at stake besides gas prices (and food prices, and the border, and crime), not to mention grave foreign policy issues. There is so much riding on this election, and it's both saddening and alarming to me that so many people are still embracing Trump, much like
the foolish lady with the snake in the song that Trump so loves to quote as a way of demeaning immigrants. But the fact is that masses of folks are still pinning their hopes on him, and my fervent hope is that Blue voters will turn out in record numbers to remove the ugly orange stain from our political landscape. (Even then, of course, the battle will be far from over; Trump might exit the main stage, but Trumpism has taken a vicious hold on this country. The work will not be done; it will just be beginning.)

By many objective measures, our country really is much better off than it was four years ago. Subjective measures are another matter; lots of folks, including me, still aren't feeling the results of that better-off status, and there are still serious problems, such as income inequality, lack of health care access, and housing insecurity. But Kamala Harris has expressed a willingness to address these problems, whereas Trump has done little more than vow revenge on his enemies, promise further tax cuts for billionaires, and outline his ambitions to be a brutal dictator like some of the tyrants he so admires. The choice should be clear.

As I'm wrapping up this post, the polls are already closing in some parts of the country. It will be many hours and perhaps several days, or maybe even longer, before we know the results, and then it will a long, long trek towards certification. I'm on pins and needles, and you probably are too. I don't expect my ramblings to change anyone's vote, but I did want to make my voice heard in this remote little corner of the blogosphere.

So now I'm off to watch the election returns, without the aid of stiff drinks or, for that matter, human company to make it a little easier. I'll see you again soon.

Before you leave...
This has been, through what is no apparent fault of her own (excluding, perhaps karmic matters that are quite beyond her ability to comprehend), a nightmare of a year for the ruler of this Whirled. Money, alas, cannot make the nightmare go away, but it can make it easier to bear. Now more than ever, donations are urgently needed and profoundly appreciated. Here are some ways to do it:

  • New: Venmo -- username @Connie-Schmidt-42. Here is a direct link to the Venmo page.
  • New: PayPal -- Here is a direct link to Cosmic Connie's PayPal page.
  • Old but still good: You can click on the "Donate" icon that currently appears on the right-hand side of every page of this blog on the Web version. There's also a donation link at the end of many of my older blog posts. In the case of both the icon and the links on the older posts, this is also a PayPal link, but it references the email account of Cosmic Connie's husband, RevRon -- which is cool, because it all ultimately goes to the same place.

NOTE: If you are donating by PayPal, please specify that your contribution is a gift, which it is (as opposed to a conventional purchase, for which PayPal deducts a percentage for their fee).

Whether you can donate or not, thank you for visiting this Whirled.

Monday, October 31, 2022

Moscow Musk and the "new" Technocracy

Q: So this is why Musk seemingly “overpaid” for Twitter? He and his backers want to use it as a tool of information warfare, to kill off the dollar and help usher in Putin’s “multipolar world?”

A: Yes, that’s why they “overpaid” for Twitter. Because the end goals have nothing to do with Twitter or its ad model by itself. It’s merely a means to an end. Musk is likely to join forces with Trump’s Truth Social and Kanye West’s Parler to try to control much of the information space. And they’ve got the threat of Putin’s nukes to force the issue.
~ Investigative journalist Dave Troy,
explaining Elon Musk's true motives for buying Twitter

Fourteen years ago, just ahead of the 2008 US presidential election and in the midst of a terrible global financial crisis, I published a post about the Technocracy movement, and I facetiously suggested Technocracy as a possible bailout plan for the modern day, or at least as a basis for the New-Wage scams I used to write about so much. In light of recent developments, perhaps it's time to drag that old post out again.

Technocracy had its roots in the years immediately following World War I, but didn't really come to fruition until the Great Depression, when folks were desperate for solutions to their financial misery. In essence, Technocracy proposed the control of society by an elite corps of technical experts, who would determine what was best for everyone else. Everyone would be taken care of, and all of their needs met, through the application of sound scientific and engineering principles. Yet Technocrats weren't motivated by altruism, morality, or ethics, and they scoffed at the idea of democracy. And although their stated goals included equality and fairness (by their definition of fairness, anyway), they were disturbingly elitist.
At its core Technocracy, like the various forms of autocracy also scorned by Technocrats, was still about power and control in the hands of a few.

Technocracy was a raging fad among many elites and elite wannabes during the lean Depression years and even into World War II, but its star dimmed considerably in the prosperous years after the war. But Technocracy never really went away. In fact it could easily be said -- and it actually has been said -- that egomaniacal multibillionaire
Elon Musk, the wealthiest man on the planet, is a Technocrat.

It would seem to run in the family. Musk's grandfather,
Joshua Haldeman, was very big in the Technocracy movement in Canada back in the day. From a November 2021 piece on the Business Live site:

Believing that science and technology could cure all ills, Haldeman campaigned for the capitalist monetary infrastructure to be replaced by a new universal currency, based on a unit of heat, to be known as the erg. The technocrats even wanted an end to prices, in the view that scientists could handle distribution within society far better than the market.

Such concepts seemed dangerous to the Canadian government, which banned the movement over its opposition to World War 2. The belief system faded away with the growth of prosperity after the war. But similar ideas are inspiring the current excitement over meme stocks, cryptocurrency and the man who now calls himself “Technoking”.

To [Harvard University historian Jill] Lepore, Musk’s ideology seems to flow from these outlandish — and outmoded — views. In Lepore’s words, his ambition is an “extravagant, extreme” even “extraterrestrial capitalism, driven by fantasies that come from science fiction”.

Professor Lepore's theory is that Musk's stated mission to colonize Mars is a reflection of Technocratic philosophy. That makes sense. What also makes sense is the notion that Musk's recent takeover of a popular social media platform is rooted in Technocratic philosophy, among other related motives that are even more disturbing.

"The bird is freed" (and even if it crashes into a window, Musk will probably get fatter on the splatter)
As almost everyone must surely know by now,
Elon Musk's deal to buy Twitter finally went through this past week. This was a hotly discussed and debated topic for many months, and I even tackled it on this Whirled, though in a broader context than the basic will-he-or-won't-he-go-through-with-it debate.

Not surprisingly, the right wingnuts and conspiranoids and hatemongers have been giddy with delight since Musk liberated the bird: they are rolling over and wetting themselves praising their Overlord as they celebrate the "return of free speech" and the "end of wokeness" on Twitter. Many have expressed their great joy by reportedly flooding the forum with the N-word, just because, like naughty kindergartners, they can. The Neo-Nazis and their ilk seem to be having a field day too.

Many others, not so happy, are just waiting for Twitter to fail, and are taking great gulps from their chilled bottles of schadenfreude because they believe Musk made a laughably horrible deal, paying far more for Twitter than it is worth. Many are also vowing to leave Twitter, perhaps migrating to Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey's nascent Bluesky forum, as if that'll show Elon.

I'm holding off on the schadenfreude myself, because I think Musk is invested in a long game that has little to do with the success or failure of Twitter, by conventional standards of success and failure (e.g., ad revenue and whatnot). And I plan to stay on Twitter -- after all, I'm pretty much of a nobody there anyway, and everyone just leaves me alone. I certainly have no plans to hop onto Bluesky. That would only be helping the dude who played a key role in Musk's deal to take Twitter private, and who happens to be good friends with Musk rather than his rival: Jack Dorsey.

Everyone who is at all concerned about Twitter, the future of actual free speech (online and off), and especially about the future of democracy, should read investigative journalist Dave Troy's October 29, 2022 piece on Medium, 'No, Elon and Jack are not “competitors.” They’re collaborating.' Troy explains that he has followed Twitter closely since its inception, and has had a chance to talk in depth about technical topics with Jack Dorsey and the company's other founders over the years. Accordingly, he has views that differ from the "well-intentioned but poorly-informed commentary and analysis" that we've seen all over the media.

To those who think Musk's purchase of Twitter is crazy because he's sure to lose tons of money, Troy counters that Musk and his backers have far broader goals than making a profit.

The goals are more ideological in nature. Musk and his backers believe that the global geopolitical arena was being warped by too much “woke” ideology and censorship, and wanted to fix that by first restoring voices that had previously been silenced —and then implementing technical and algorithmic solutions that allow each user to get the experience they want. They think this can “solve” the problems that people cite about social media content. Making money, they figure, will come from the secondary effects of enabling “free speech” and the possibility of building other services like payments and replacing government on top of such an app. Plus the company’s social graph data is a goldmine for other businesses that may wish to benefit from detailed knowledge of the makeup of society.

And that's where the Technocracy angle comes in, where Twitter is concerned. Dave Troy believes it's completely naive to think that there is a technical solution to harmful content, which is likely to lead to more radicalization and cultish behavior.

...they are being willfully ignorant of the harmful side effects of content. It is a kind of tech fundamentalist solutionism that posits that for any difficult problem, there must be a technical solution. Many sociologists and cultural scholars would argue differently.

But the Technocracy aspect goes far beyond Twitter, and out into the further reaches of Space. Troy points out that back in April of this year, Dorsey wrote:

In principle, I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter. It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the singular solution I trust. I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness.

Wow. That sounds pretty spiritual, especially for a sociopathic ego-tripper like Musk -- although, come to think of it, this blog is littered with posts about sociopathic ego-trippers who talk a good game about "light" and "consciousness" (this guy and this guy, for instance), so never mind. In any case, Troy explains what Dorsey really meant by "the light of consciousness."

This is a reference to “longtermism,” the heavily marketed philosophy being promoted by Musk and his friend William MacAskill that asserts the only thing that matters is humanity’s future in space, and that the only goal of the living is to maximize the number of future humans alive, as well as the number of artificial intelligence instances that could possibly exist in the future. This mandate is most often used to brush aside calls for improving conditions and alleviating suffering among the living here on Earth now. Because, the theory goes, giving a poor person a blanket isn’t likely to be as useful for the future of humanity as building a rocket to Mars. Longtermism is heavily influenced by “Russian Cosmism” and is also directly adjacent to “Effective Altruism.” Musk’s stated mission, which he intends to fulfill in his lifetime, is to “make humanity a multiplanetary species.” The anti-democratic urge in longtermism is rooted in the belief that “mob rule” will lead to nuclear annihilation; we should, Musk thinks, be guided by “wiser” minds — like his and Putin’s apparently.

What it all seems to boil down to is that Elon Musk is a Technocrat of the worst sort, putting all of his faith in technological solutions to everything, but caring far less about applying those solutions to the suffering masses on Earth today than to future generations of multiplanetary humans. And making him an even worse sort of Technocrat -- and human being -- is his malignant narcissism. All of his grandiose plans and pronouncements seem to be chiefly a means of drawing attention to himself, enabling him to suck all the oxygen out of the room, much like another malignant narcissist we know of promised, in so many words, to do years ago. (That guy has fulfilled his promise, or rather his threat, many times over, of course.)

In any case, Elon's Mars thing is in the future. Meanwhile back on Earth, in the present day, Moscow Musk is cozying up to Vlad and the MAGAs and other foul characters.

Musk also seems pretty interested in helping advance Putin’s “multipolar world order,” which is why he plays footsie with QAnon and MAGA accounts, and pals around with Putin and Dmitry Medvedev. “How are things going in Bakhmut?,” Musk asked Medvedev.

Nice guy.

Troy ends with a warning to all of us:

Ultimately what we are dealing with is the fact that social engineering through control of the information environment is an inevitable reality—the only question is who has the means and moral authority to do it.

If democracy-minded people don’t seize control of the information environment, powerful sociopathic autocrats will do so instead. We leave a power vacuum open at our peril, and at the moment, Musk and Putin are the ones with the most will to fill it.

Again, I urge you to read Troy's entire piece on Medium. Here's that link again. Read it. And don't forget to vote, if you're eligible and registered.