Showing posts with label Tony Robbins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tony Robbins. Show all posts

Sunday, August 13, 2023

Sound Of Freedom funders' hall of shame, and the Utah/Mormon huckster connection

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and his fellow Mormon Tim Ballard, who is the inspiration for the highly fictionalized summer hit movie Sound Of Freedom, are good buds, not to mention devoted Trumpsters.

Much of this post was originally part of the August 7, 2023 Whirled post about the arrest of Fabian Marta, one of thousands of participants in the crowdfunding of the hit movie Sound Of Freedom. I decided that it works better as a separate post, with additional content and links.
~ CC

Twitter/X user, podcaster, and former alternate-reality game developer Jim Stewartson, who describes himself as an anti-disinfo activist, was the first source I know of to report on the late July 2023 arrest of a guy named Fabian Marta, who helped crowdfund the highly fictionalized hit movie about child sex trafficking, Sound Of Freedom. Marta was charged with being an accessory to felony child kidnapping. I wrote about that on my previous post on this Whirled.

Most of the mainstream press, and Stewartson himself for that matter, framed their reporting, or at least their headlines, around the fact that Marta was a funder of Sound Of Freedom. The big hook, of course, was that a financial backer of this passionately anti-child-trafficking movie was himself (allegedly) involved in felony child kidnapping. In my post I tried to draw a middle ground, stressing that Marta was only one of thousands of participants in the P&A (prints and advertising) campaign ahead of the movie's release.

But I also emphasized that Marta's arrest had become a story in the first place because of his own public bragging about his role in bringing the movie to audiences after Disney had shelved it. And I also noted that even if Marta is ultimately exonerated of the child kidnapping charges, he's still an unsavory character with ties to the sexually exploitative sugar daddy/sugar baby culture, and to top it off, he's apparently a reich-wingnut.

Credibility is not an all-or-nothing thing
Regarding Jim Stewartson, I am well aware of assertions that he is not the most credible of sources. For example, a May 2023 Vice article claims that in his extensive writings about disgraced former national security advisor and loyal Trumpcult member Michael Flynn, Stewartson has so far failed to produce credible hard evidence of his declarations that Flynn is for all practical purposes the infamous "Q" (of QAnon infamy), or that Flynn is part of a Kremlin-funded psyop to destroy U.S. democracy. (If you want to go a little further back in time, a May 2021 Vice article gives more background info about Stewartson, focusing on his involvement with fighting QAnon, via an organization he founded called The Thinkin Project (the name is a pun on the anti-Trump org The Lincoln Project).)

The May 2023 Vice piece about Stewartson and Flynn was published in the wake of
a defamation lawsuit that Flynn had filed in Florida against Stewartson. Vice basically presented the saga as being a case of conspiracist vs. conspiracist. (If you're willing to take a peek down the rabbit hole, here's a February 2022 post from Stewartson about the Flynn/Q connection.)

But there's no doubt that whether or not he is actually "Q," the loathsome Flynn is a fierce conspiracist who isn't afraid to embrace QAnonsense and other wackadoodle conspiracies, not to mention that he's a big supporter of Donald Trump's efforts to destroy American democracy. He may be a lunatic, but he's a dangerous one. And while I am not, at this point, willing to go all the way down the Flynn-Kremlin-psyops rabbit hole with Stewartson, I agree with his basic premise that Flynn is a peril to America.

More importantly to this post and my previous one, I will say that in my opinion, Stewartson's reporting on what some journalists have described as the "Q-adjacent" film Sound Of Freedom does have credibility. That's why I've cited him in my blog posts about the movie and its principals and funders.


One of Stewartson's X posts that caught my eye
was his response to a post by Angel Studios, the distributor of Sound Of Freedom, following Fabian Marta's arrest. Angel Studios expressed gratitude towards law enforcement for their fine work in collaring child traffickers and kidnappers. Stewartson wrote:

Hey @AngelStudiosInc if you are so grateful to law enforcement for arresting “Sound of Freedom” funder Fabian Marta, did you screen your funders, producers, and actors before putting them in the credits? Are you going to now? If Fabian Marta was the only funder with problems, that would be one thing. He’s isn’t.

  • Eduardo Verastegui, producer/actor, disciple of one of the worst pedophiles in Mexican history, Marcial Maciel, and current member of infamous pedophile-ridden child trafficking Catholic congregation Legion of Christ
  • Alejandro Monteverde, director, whose only two other films were with Verastegui, including the last film in 2015 called “Little Boy” which was a small budget movie about a dwarf teenager which required more than a thousand prepubescent boys to audition for some reason
  • Former richest man, Carlos Slim, funder, a Mexican mafia warlord who enables drug and human trafficking at scale
  • Tony Robbins, funder, MAGA self-help fraud in business with international terrorist Erik Prince, and credibly accused of sexual harassment of underage girls
  • Lee Severino, producer, who admits to grooming his wife while she was an underage high school girl and he was her church guidance counselor, and did a film with Verastegui and Monteverde while infamous pedophile Marcial Maciel was still alive
  • Tim Ballard, producer/alleged subject of the film, says he has watched thousands of hours of CSAM [child sex abuse material] and can’t watch his own movie, and raised money by spreading the lie that children are sold in Wayfair cabinets
  • Jim Caviezel, actor, brainwashed QAnon/Pizzagate propagandist who can’t find work anywhere else and makes a living lying to people at QAnon conferences

So Angel Studios, this entire production is dirty and you know it. Are you going to distance yourself from the rest of your cast and crew? I will wait.

I won't comment on that entire list, though I urge you to research some of those names in more detail, and I can't wholeheartedly agree with Stewartson that "this entire production is dirty." I do, however, want to mention that Alejandro Monteverde, the director and screenwriter of Sound Of Freedom, seems to be trying even more desperately than Angel Studios has been doing to distance himself and his film from QAnon conspiracy narratives, as well as from the furious and deeply divisive U.S. political angle. That's according to an August 14, 2023 article in Variety, which among other things quotes Monteverde as saying, in reference to Jim Caviezel and Tim Ballard, "There's people that are too close to the film that are in politics. So it's like, I love you, but I have to keep my distance." (Monteverde did not attend the July screening of Sound Of Freedom at Trump's Bedminster golf resort.)

In his interview with Variety, Monteverde also provides insight into the gigantic ego of Tim Ballard. The piece is worth a read, though I also need to point out that in listing Monteverde's previous film accomplishments, it does not mention Little Boy, the movie Stewartson cited in the X post quoted above.

Regarding another name on the list, this one much more familiar to most folks, I also want to note, as I also had on a previous Whirled post, that it's true that selfish-help huckster Tony Robbins, the subject of several posts on this blog, is a major investor in Sound Of Freedom. That's in contrast to Fabian Marta, who, as noted above, was just one of thousands of crowdfunders.

Not surprisingly, Robbins is a good buddy of Tim Ballard, who is of course the inspiration for Sound Of Freedom. The two of them were even involved in a murky rescue op together; Vice.com spilled the details in an August 12, 2021 article that's pretty eye-opening. (Note that the investigation of Ballard and Operation Underground Railroad (O.U.R.) that was mentioned in the article has since been closed, but a newer investigation into same is apparently still ongoing, and may have been related to Ballard's recent departure from O.U.R. But O.U.R. is being very tight-lipped about that one so far.)

In addition, allegations of sexual harassment and other types of abuse have been leveled against Tony Robbins. Regarding those allegations, see the "Related on this Whirled" links following this post for background information.


Moreover, not all of the unsavory characters funding the film have a connection to human trafficking or pedophiles. Some are just plain fraudsters. Consider one of the movie's executive producers, Andrew McCubbins, who in 2020 pleaded guilty to defrauding Medicare of $89 million.
From Insider, July 13, 2023:

Sound of Freedom executive producer Andrew McCubbins, a Utah serial entrepreneur, ran a telemedicine company that paid kickbacks to physicians and nurses in exchange for unnecessary prescriptions for genetic screening tests, which were processed by a lab McCubbins owned, according to charging documents and an Insider interview with McCubbins. Medicare reimbursed up to $8,000 per test, according to the federal indictment.

Hollywood scoundrels v Mormons on a mission
I know what some defenders of Sound Of Freedom and its principals may be thinking. The movie biz -- in particular, the mainstream Hollywood system that has so firmly entrenched itself in our culture -- is not known for being a paragon of morality and ethics. If every producer/investor/financier were required to be a choir boy or girl, tons of movies would have never gotten off the ground. And that is a valid point. Some of my favorite films bear the name
"Harvey Weinstein" in the production credits. Honestly, seeing that name in the post-#MeToo era makes me wince...but not enough to make me stop enjoying the movies.

However, Angel Studios' entire mission, where film is concerned, is framed in their determination to do better than Hollywood in every way, most particularly spiritually and morally. They're all about spreading love and light, Jesus-style, to a "faith-based" audience egregiously under-served by Hollywood. So maybe, just maybe, their standards should be a little bit higher.

On the other hand, Angel Studios, along with the entire Angel empire, is a
Utah-based organization, and Utah is infamously "the land of bilk and money," in the words of one of the world's most ignored bloggers (that would be me). A much less ignored blogger, in his day, is Jason "Salty Droid" Jones, who years ago did a lot of impressive, groundbreaking work regarding Utah boiler rooms and multi-level marketing scams and state government corruption and whatnot, and who once said to a reporter for a Utah alternative weekly, "Fraud built Utah like cocaine built Miami."

I suspect things haven't changed much since that 2012 article. If there's one thing I learned from all of Jason Jones' posts on this general topic, it's that the huckster circles in Utah are pretty tight, often supported by grifting Utah politicians, and arguably reinforced by the fact that almost all of the participants share the unique bond of Mormonism.

I linked to this May 2021 Substack post in a resource list at the end of a previous Whirled post, but it's appropriate to bring it up again. Titled "A cult within a cult: Operation Underground Railroad, the Mormon church, and me," the post illuminates how Tim Ballard exploited that Mormon bond to persuade gullible people to support his mission. It's very well worth reading.

None of the above is an attack on Mormonism per se, just an acknowledgment of those undeniable bonds that, while undoubtedly inspiring good deeds, can also inspire or validate bad or at least misguided ones (and
are even a major factor in the coverup of truly horrendous deeds such as sexual abuse within the Church community, including child sex abuse). And unfortunately, due to the tight bonds within Latter-day Saints culture, innocent Mormons are uniquely vulnerable to fraud such as Ponzi schemes perpetrated by other Mormons. This is known as "affinity fraud."

To give a contemporary example of what I suspect is a Mormon-based bond among the not so innocent and vulnerable -- if you'll pardon a brief but pertinent digression -- Utah's current attorney general,
Sean Reyes, who has been described as a confidant and friend of Tim Ballard, has scoffed at "media attacks" on Ballard and says Ballard is "a true hero." According to the July 14, 2023 Faithwire article linked to in the previous sentence, Reyes added that anyone doubting Ballard's experience and credibility is doing so from "absolute ignorance." Clearly, Reyes is conflating legitimate criticism, questioning, and clarification of his true hero with "attacking."

It's not a real big stretch to imagine that Reyes might possibly have exerted undue influence in Davis County, Utah DA Troy Rawlings' decision in March of this year to close out the two-and-a-half-year criminal investigation into Ballard and O.U.R. I linked to an article about this matter above, in the part about Tony Robbins and Ballard being buds, but here's that link again. From the article:

The reviewed charges by Rawlings’ office included communications fraud, witness tampering and retaliation against a witness, victim or informant, according to a declination statement which Rawlings confirmed was authentic.

The determination to close the investigation came after Rawlings’ office received and reviewed financial audits of Operation Underground Railroad and information supplied by law enforcement agencies including the Utah Attorney General’s Office, the document says.

Rawlings’ office also took into account details provided by Operation Underground Railroad about the organization’s domestic and international initiatives and “the current prosecutorial priorities of the Davis County Attorney’s Office” in making the decision, according to the document.

“In sum, the Davis County Attorney’s Office does not believe that the decision to pursue charges against O.U.R. or any individuals associated with O.U.R. is prudent,” the declination reads.

"Prosecutorial priorities" and the belief that pursuing charges against O.U.R. wouldn't be "prudent"... well, that could cover a wide range of possibilities. Of course, there's always the possibility that they actually did do a thorough investigation and honestly found no wrongdoing. But I find myself running low on benefits of the doubt to give.

Of note, AG Reyes, like his good buddy Tim Ballard, is also apparently a staunch Trumpster, and is one of 11 GOP attorneys general who used their offices to defend Trump, following the August 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago, by filing an amicus brief in September 2022, accusing the Biden administration of "ransacking" Trump's home. Also in September 2022, a group called The 65 Project filed an ethics complaint against Reyes with the Office of Professional Conduct over his "concerted" effort to overturn legitimate 2020 presidential election results.

To round out his far-reich creds, Reyes also believes that women who travel out of state to get an abortion should be tracked, because otherwise states' rights to enforce their own abortion laws would be unlawfully hindered. (States' rights only go so far with him, though. A few years ago he and his fellow rethuglican gun-nut AGs were campaigning for legislation that would allow people with a concealed-carry permit in one state to legally carry a gun in any state, because they claimed that to prevent permit holders from carrying outside their home state infringes on the Second Amendment.)

But I don't want to go too far down the Reyes rabbit hole right now. (If you want to,
check out this August 21, 2022 video by journalist Lynn Packer, featuring best buds Sean Reyes and Tim Ballard.)

Getting back now to Angel Studios and Sound Of Freedom, the point I wish to make is that regardless of any given business's lofty mission statements, when push comes to shove it's generally all about the Benjamins, and
the Harmon brothers, co-founders of Angel Studios, are no exception. They're nothing if not serial entrepreneurs, having made bucketloads of bucks by, among other enterprises, creating viral ads for products such as the Squatty Potty, which starred a cute little unicorn pooping out rainbow-colored soft-serve ice cream and had a  coprophagia theme, all in good fun, of course. Then there was a thing they had going for a while, VidAngel, where they committed serious copyright violations by taking feature films, decrypting them and "sanitizing" them for a wholesome (Mormon) audience, and streaming them. They ended up paying $9.9 million in settlements to various movie studios, and founded Angel Studios in order to create and distribute original content.

Notwithstanding the straw-man criticisms often leveled against anyone who dares to criticize aggressively capitalist (or crapitalist) entrepreneurs, I'm not claiming that there's anything intrinsically wrong with being motivated by the desire to make money. And the Harmon bros are apparently very good at doing just that, even if they have crossed legal lines in the process. What I am saying is that the money making mission appears to be their top concern, and in that regard they're not all that different from the Hollywood establishment.

Sound Of Freedom was already completed by the time Angel took over the advertising and distribution. Due to various issues regarding the original studio's merger with Disney, the movie was lying in limbo until
Angel Studios acquired the rights for $5 million. But the Harmons, with their eye$ on the prize, apparently didn't think that the unsavory backgrounds (including pedo connections) of some of the principals involved in the film's production -- not to mention the lunatic Q-ravings in real life of the movie's lead -- were a big deal.

It's also not inconceivable that their fellow Mormon,
the relentlessly self-aggrandizing and egotistical Tim Ballard, exerted some influence in Angel's decision to take on this tribute to Ballard's own (exaggerated) courage and heroism. Angel Studios says that through its platform, thousands of "Angel" investors choose which titles will be created, funded, and distributed, and that decisions are driven by creators and audiences. But this doesn't rule out any ties between Ballard and the Harmons, nor does it invalidate my point about the deeper, behind-the-scenes bonds among Utah/Mormon hucksters (and politicians, for that matter). If Salty Droid were still blogging, he'd very likely be on this like a rainbow on unicorn poop, but I guess you'll just have to settle for me for now. Or do your own research, and feel free to share it here.

Call for transparency
I'm thinking that in light of all of the buzz about Fabian Marta and other funders and financial backers, Angel Studios needs to publish and make easily accessible a complete list of all of the major investors, crowdfunders, and others who helped finance Sound Of Freedom ahead of its release, as well as the amount of money each one contributed. I don't mean that I think the names of and other info about individual "Pay It Forward" participants should be publicized; that would be an invasion of privacy. But I do think there should be disclosure of the names and amounts involved in the film's production as well as those who contributed to the crowdfunding before the movie was released. This might not do much to stop the swirl of speculation and wild rumors on "both sides," but it would be another step towards some much-needed transparency.

Transparency appears to be a big issue with Sound Of Freedom, though. According to
The Hollywood Reporter (August 8, 2023), Angel Studios isn't exactly being forthcoming about how much of the film's $164 million (and counting) domestic take has come from donated tickets through the studio's innovative "Pay It Forward" scheme -- which allows people to buy and donate tickets for others to use -- and how much comes from those bought directly by a moviegoer.

A spokesman for Angel Studios says that the vast majority of tickets are being bought by humans and that only redeemed tickets are counted when reporting grosses to Comscore, the industry record-keeper of box office grosses. But many in the film industry continue to be skeptical, especially given the standard disclaimer on the Angel Studios web site that "Angel Studios becomes the owner of all funds upon receipt and may use them at its sole discretion to further the Angel Studios’ mission of amplifying light through impactful stories.”

In a recent-ish Facebook conversation with an ultra-right-wing friend who's a fan of Sound Of Freedom, I commented that where this film is concerned, I think Angel Studios' intentions are good and that despite the negative press, they're not overtly trying to promote political divisiveness or Q-lunacy through the movie. I stand by that opinion, but would like to amend it: Angel Studios' intentions may be good, but overall those intentions are not all that much better than those of the Hollywood establishment that the American reich, particularly the "faith-based" sector, so loves to vilify.

Related on this Whirled:

Sunday, December 08, 2019

Flawsuits and bad whines and fake Xmas wars: a few Sunday leftovers

It's a lazy Sunday, and since I don't feel like cooking up a substantial post from scratch today, I'm serving a plate of reheated leftovers, in the form of updates on previous posts.

Tony Baloney banks on luck o'the Irish to stifle BuzzFeed News and Twitter
Earlier this year, on
May 29 and June 22 to be exact, I wrote a couple of posts about BuzzFeed News' ongoing series covering accusations against selfish-help icon Tony Robbins. Robbins had been accused by numerous parties of emotional, physical, and in some cases sexual abuse and misconduct. He had repeatedly denied the allegations and had threatened to sue BuzzFeed if they didn't retract their stories and/or quit writing about him.

As I noted in an update to my June 22 post, but am bumping it up here as well (along with some additional content), BuzzFeed published yet another installment in its Tony Robbins series on November 22, 2019 --
that's Part 6, for those who are keeping track. This latest story covered Robbins' alleged sexual abuse of a minor female at a summer camp in Southern Cali way back in 1985, when Tony was 25, but already rich and famous.

Following the publication of that piece, Tony, who denies those allegations as well, had apparently had enough.
He has now decided to SLAPP Buzzfeed with a defamation flawsuit, and is currently threatening to sue Twitter too in the bargain, apparently for allowing people to tweet about the Buzzfeed series. But he's not suing in the United States; rather, he's suing in Ireland, with his lawyer rationalizing that Dublin is Twitter's European headquarters.

Here's
a Scribd link to the complaint.

The Irish Times reported that Robbins is being represented by a Belfast-based libel lawyer named Paul Tweed, who denies the claim that Robbins, like other public figures who have filed unsuccessful defamation suits in the United States, is engaging in "libel tourism." Tweed also countered BuzzFeed's accusation that Robbins was abusing the Irish courts, since BuzzFeed's headquarters and primary audience are in the US. He noted that the BuzzFeed journalists who wrote the articles are based in the UK. But BuzzFeed spoksman Matt Mittenthal responded to that by pointing out that Ireland is "a sovereign nation that hasn't been part of the UK for nearly 100 years. This is a bizarre and flimsy attempt to justify a transparent legal manoeuvre."

And Mike Masnick,
writing on the TechDirt site on December 4, cut to the chase:
Of course, the real reason to sue in Ireland is because either lawsuit would be laughed out of court in the US. The bar to prove defamation against a public figure like Robbins would make it nearly impossible for Robbins to win a defamation lawsuit here, unless he could somehow prove that Buzzfeed made up the reporting, which seems highly unlikely. And, of course, Section 230 of the CDA would protect Twitter. Even in Europe, it seems unlikely that Twitter could be held liable for how other people tweeted, just because Mr. Robbins is "aggrieved" about how this story spread.
Meanwhile, BuzzFeed continues to stand by their reporting.

Whinemaker Trump Junior gets triggered again
In late November
I posted a lengthy snarkalysis about the reactions to Donald Trump Jr.'s first book, Triggered: How the Left Thrives on Hate and Wants to Silence Us, which had been released earlier that month. The book quickly soared to the top of some prestigious bestseller lists, but lots of folks were crying foul in the wake of revelations that numerous republican/conservative orgs, including the Republican National Committee (RNC) made bulk purchases.

One point I made in my post was that even though sales of DJTJ's magnum dopus were indeed artificially boosted by those mass purchases, the book most likely would have done pretty well on its own, thanks to the cult of Trumpism. I also pointed out that although it's a given that the Trump family are scammers, bulk purchasing isn't illegal and in fact is commonly done, by scammers and non-scammers alike.

But I also made the point, as I have before, that right-wingers and conservatives seem to be more easily "triggered" (and hate-filled) than the lefties and liberals whom they're continually accusing of being hyper-sensitive snowflakes. Junior himself filled the pages of Triggered with his own whining about how awfully he and his family have been treated. As if to reinforce that particular point, on November 30
DJTJ uncorked another bottle of red whine on Twitter when he groused that airport bookstores operated by Hudson News bookstores are refusing to sell Triggered. He griped that he'd been in seven different airports that week and hadn't seen it. "Why not have the #1 book?" he tweeted. "Usual BS I suppose?"

The tweet, with its strong implication of a nefarious liberal conspiracy to squelch the book,
inspired his minions to flood Hudson News' social media accounts, berating them for their alleged participation in the conspiracy. But Junior's lament also inspired a flood of snarky rejoinders from those who are, to put it mildly, not supporters. One Twitter user responded to Trump's complaint by saying that he thought the books were fully stocked in the fiction section; another one, using the handle @MuellerSheWrote, noted that "there are boxes and boxes of them at the RNC."

Apparently Triggered is for sale on Hudson Booksellers' website, but regarding its brick-and-mortar stores, Hudson didn't respond to request from Newsweek for comment about Junior's tweet.

I wonder if Junior also thinks it's part of the "usual BS"/triggered-lib conspiracy that his book
was pretty quickly bumped from its number-one spot on the New York Times bestseller list by a scathing tome about his daddy, A Warning, By Anonymous. 

Phony holiday wars continue
Just the other day I was nattering about the phony "war on Christmas," which this year was joined, thanks to #NotMyPresident Donald John Trump, by the phony "war on Thanksgiving." With my usual gift for stating the painfully obvious, I predicted that despite Trump's declaration that the Xmas "war" had been won, the conservanoids weren't about to relinquish that phony construct entirely.

And along comes
right-wing nutcake/culture-wars veteran/Trump ally/career hypocrite Newt Gingrich to prove me right. He and another top Trumpanzee, former Acting Attorney (and scammer) General Matthew Whitaker, have come right out and stated that those demonic Democrats, with all of that impeachment nonsense, are ruining Christmas. #Impeachment is the new #HappyHolidays, I guess.

Newt went on Fox News to cry his crocodile tears about the degradation of the holiday by the impeachment, which in typical Trumpian form he described as "a modern-day lynch mob." But as many others have pointed out, including Charlie Nash on Mediaite,
Newt himself participated in the ruination of Christmas back on December 19, 1998 when he was Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the House voted to impeach President Bill Clinton.

Jack Holmes,
writing in Esquire, also made note of Gingrich's hypocrisy, adding:
...what tale of shameless grandstanding would be complete without a contribution from Matthew Whitaker, the former Big Dick Toilet Salesman whom the president once saw fit to make the Acting Attorney General of the United States?
That's right, folks: turn off that Bing Crosby. Shut down the Mariah Carey. Nix the "Wonderful Christmastime"—which, contrary to blasphemous reports in this very magazine, is good. It's going to be all impeachment, all the time. Give your Dad a congressional gavel in a box. (Or a T-shirt from War on Christmas x Impeachment.) Of course, what Whitaker's really saying is that people may be forced to discuss the president's assault on the American Constitution at some point this holiday season, which simply will not do. Then again, this is the same guy who jumped on Fox News in October to declare that "abuse of power is not a crime." It is, however, the most essential reason to impeach a president. Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas indeed. And a Happy Impeachment.

That's it for now; more soon.

Saturday, June 22, 2019

Heat is still on Tony Robbins, but don't cry for him

In my previous post I wrote about the fallout from BuzzFeed News' investigative series on selfish-help giant Tony Robbins, the first installment of which was published on May 17 of this year. The stories, particularly the first one, generated tons of coverage in the news and entertainment media, as well as some heated conversations on social media. But wait, there's more.

BuzzFeed keeps on buzzin'
Since my last post, two more installments in the series have seen the light of day. On
June 18, BuzzFeed News posted an article with the rather sensationalist headline:

Tony Robbins Punishes Followers By Making Them Drink Unidentified Brown Liquid “Designed To Have A Lasting Effect”

And immediately beneath the headline:
At high-pressure seminars, the self-help superstar punishes people who don't measure up by feeding them a "gross shot" of unidentified brown liquid. His lawyers denied the mixture contains laxatives.
Granted, this sounds absolutely horrible. It makes Robbins seem like a sadist and the drinkers like helpless victims. And maybe you would argue that that's it in a nutshell, and I would say you probably have a case -- Robbins is clearly full of himself and at times almost maliciously confident of his "power" over others; and after investing big bucks and being browbeaten for hours or days, people's defenses are almost certainly way down -- but there is context. Apparently the coerced drinking is part of a specific competitive exercise that has taken place at some of Robbins' seminars: participants who "fail" at some contrived challenge are called onstage in front of large crowds and coerced into drinking an unidentified, gross-looking brown mixture that, according to a former staffer, they are led to believe contains a laxative. Internal docs and videos also reveal Robbins placing "L" (for "loser") stickers on their foreheads while the song "Loser" by Beck plays over the speakers.
 
Presumably this is all in the service of empowering them to live more passionate and fulfilled and purposeful lives and whatnot -- which, I probably don't have to tell you but will mention it anyway, is the rationale that has been used at every selfish-help seminar from
the est of daze gone by, to est imitators such as Lifespring, to the man-camp abuses perpetrated by orgs such as The ManKind Project, to James Arthur Ray's repeatedly hazardous and ultimately deadly faux sweat lodge events. And even Keith Raniere, that loathsome, recently convicted excuse for a man who headed the women-branding sex cult NXIVM, probably convinced his followers that the atrocities he commited against them were for their own good.

But if you look at it in the larger context of the sometimes appalling, sometimes dangerous, and occasionally fatal goings-on at selfish-help/McSpirituality/New-Wage events, drinking some gross brown stuff while being called a "loser" in front of a few thousand other folks, who also paid good money to be deceived and abused by a hulking huckster, is arguably on the less extreme, even if not totally benign, end of the business-as-usual spectrum.

That doesn't make it a good thing, of course, and the aforementioned Robbins ex-staffer told BuzzFeed News, "I always felt that this was highly inappropriate and falls into the category of public shaming, which is common for Robbins." Other observers said that it really seemed that Robbins was bullying the participants into drinking the "gross shots." Yep, bullying is precisely what is so often done at these events. And when the gurus aren't bullying, they are, more often than not, aggressively upselling and coercively "persuading."

Other former insiders told BuzzFeed that they'd also witnessed fans pressured into drinking supplements and juices outside of the "competitive" events. Despite assurances that the drinks would have health benefits, many people got sick. Gary King, Robbins' former director of security, said that people who'd downed the concoctions were "throwing up all over the place, in public restrooms, in hotel rooms."

As for the "gross shots" headlined in the BuzzFeed piece, Robbins' lawyers denied they contained laxatives but were instead a mix of "pickle juice, apple juice, lemon juice, tomato juice and a dash of tabasco." They insisted that no formal reports or complaints had ever been made about the drink.

The day after the gross-shots story was posted,
BuzzFeed followed up with Part 5 of the series, reporting that nine more former followers and staffers had come forward to accuse Robbins of inappropriate behavior that included groping women and mistreating vulnerable followers. Not surprisingly, Robbins "strongly denied" all of the new allegations, and his lawyers inundated BuzzFeed News with nearly two dozen glowing statements about Tony's impeccable character and behavior. Of note, many of those folks are still employed by Robbins and didn't work for him during the period of the alleged sexual misconduct.

But as with the first story in the series, it's not just about sex. The BuzzFeed piece cites several examples of people who claim to have have either witnessed psychological abuse or trauma at Robbins' events, or experienced it themselves. The accounts will sound pretty familiar to anyone who has even casually studied the dark side of the selfish-help industry. For instance, a staffer named Elizabeth told BuzzFeed about reading a 2017 account from a female participant who wrote on Robbins' Facebook page, saying that the event she'd attended was "overwhelming" and "awful" for her. She wrote that she'd been in her hotel room for the past five days, experiencing "extremes" and desperately in need of help.

According to Elizabeth, her team often received these types of messages. "She was clearly in distress and there was no protocol on how to handle it, even though it wasn't uncommon," Elizabeth explained, adding that everyone would "bump these concerns up but then nobody would do anything."

But Robbins' lawyers insisted that participants are always warned in advance of the "commitment and hours involved," and that there is a "robust medical team" onsite to lend support should something go wrong. They added that Robbins' conduct and that of all of his trainers in engaging with participants is "strictly governed by established protocol."

Still, given the fact that
this is the selfish-help industry we're talking about, "established protocol" could mean just about anything, or nothing. And I seriously doubt that Robbins' "robust" medical team was anywhere near that distraught woman who was freaking out in her hotel room after the fact. So maybe take some of that into consideration when making up your mind.

Canceled gigs
Ever since the first BuzzFeed story broke, I've read countless expressions of either fear or of hope that this "exposure" will finally mark the beginning of the end of Tony Robbins. But at this point I still don't think so, and said as much at the conclusion of
my last post. You know... "the dogs bark, but the caravan moves on." I may be wrong, but so far there's no indication that the fans are jumping ship en masse.

Even so, the BuzzFeed buzz has not died down, and indeed, Tony Robbins is frequently described these days as "embattled." And there have been some repercussions... well, maybe they're repercussions, and maybe they're just coincidences, depending upon whom you want to believe. F'rinstance, not long after the first stories came out, there were a couple of related-to-each-other developments that most media accounts framed as being a result of the accusations uncovered by BuzzFeed.

First it was announced that registered investment advisor (RIA)
Creative Planning, which caters to the affluent, had severed ties with Robbins, three years after hiring him as a "Chief of Investor Psychology." That's a pretty silly title if you ask me, and even if you don't ask me, but I'm thinking it was code for "expert on manipulating people out of their money." Anyhow, it was assumed by many in and out of the investment industry that this separation was a direct result of the accusations against Robbins, and the company was praised by some for the action they'd taken.

A week later, however, Creative Planning claimed that the split had actually been in the works for months before the allegations came to light. Peter Mallouk, the company's CEO of Creative Planning (he's also the owner), said that Robbins and Creative Planning had been "negotiating an exit" for six months, and that it was "a mutual decision and amicable." The scandalous accusations, according to Mallouk's version, had absolutely nothing to do with the breakup.

Shortly after the Creative Planning announcement, it was also revealed that
an upcoming book by Robbins was dropped by the publisher. Actually, however, he was only listed as a co-author of the book in question, The Path: Accelerating Your Journey to Financial Freedom. His co-author was none other than the aforementioned Peter Mallouk of Creative Planning. But Mallouk himself, as well as a spokeswoman for Robbins, stated that although the book was in the works, contractual terms had never been reached nor finalized with the publisher. Robbins spokeswoman Jennifer Connelly told NBC News, "It is a false and misleading characterization to state that this was a book authored by Mr. Robbins."

This
May 30, 2019 piece from the RIABiz site offers a little more insight. Apparently Robbins had authored two chapters of the book, some other person had written one, and Mallouk had penned the rest. But Mallouk and Robbins had teamed up for a previous book, Unshakeable, which is mentioned in this August 2018 fluff piece, also from RIABiz. And here, from the same site, is an April 2016 piece that speculates on the then-new business bromance between Robbins and Mallouk. Just a little history, if you're interested; take all of it for what it's worth. You can believe the media accounts or you can believe the PR statements from the RIA and the book publisher and Robbins' people.

But far as I'm concerned, it's just as well that Tony Robbins lost the financial-advice gig and possible book deal. After all,
as my pal Salty Droid documented years ago, Robbins is, to put it mildly, not the most qualified or credible financial expert.
According to The New York Times :: Tony Robbins is qualified to write a book about financial planning for the masses … because he’s life coach to hedge fund white guy John Tudor Jones. Tony has special access to life’s high achievers … and he passes their highly applicable secrets on to the rest of us {for a small to life ruining fee}.

A couple of years ago Tony Robbins was using the exact same :: “I wanted to help people get their retirements back after the crash” type line he uses here … to sell us on his special access to Frank Kern and
The Syndicate … who Robbins labeled The New Money Masters.
And if you want more, let's turn to RIABiz again, with this November 2014 reprinted review of Robbins' book, Money! Master the Game, the work that reportedly set the ball rolling for Mallouk-Robbins' Unshakeable. The teaser on the site states that the book contains "a few sound nuggets but gimmicks, fallacies and straw men abound."

Please do take the time to read (or re-read, if you wish) that Salty Droid post I linked to above, and listen to the embedded audio of the hard-sell sales call, perpetrated by some of Robbins' then-cohorts. And remember that none of this has anything to do with #MeToo-ish allegations. The #MeToo movement was still a couple of years in the future at the time this post was published. Rather, this is all about financial exploitation of some of the most vulnerable folks -- and no matter how you may personally feel about how Tony Robbins is a force for good in the world and/or about how he has changed your life, his big fingers have also been in the filthy financial-exploitation pie for years.

For many reasons it would be foolish to weep for Tony, or to weep at all, because of his separation from Creative Planning and the collapsed book deal. Regardless of whether or not those events have anything to do with the allegations in the BuzzFeed series, it's probably best for everyone that legitimate financial advice firms steer clear of Robbins.

Alphabitching and other reactions
I have yet to see any indication that Robbins intends to make good on his threat to take legal action against BuzzFeed. And apart from that
"open letter" Robbins posted on Medium.com the very day that the first story was published, and the odd video here and there, he hasn't said much publicly about the matter. But that hasn't stopped a lot of his rank-and-file defenders from mouthing off.

The worst of the offensively defensive reactions that I've seen have come from various alt-right-leaning
men's-rights activists (MRAs) who fancy themselves "alpha males" and sneer at "beta males" and at those even lower in their imaginary heirarchy, while consistently rejecting the very notion that some men rape or sexually abuse women. (Here's RationalWiki's take on MRAs.) I want to say right off that I am not for a moment suggesting that all of Robbins' fans, followers, and defenders fall into these categories, nor am I insinuating that Robbins himself embraces or encourages MRA dogma.

That said, on various social media discussions I've seen some defenses of Robbins that shamelessly reflect these mindsets. I've been privy to a bit of nattering about alpha males and how they are constantly being hammered by the #MeToo crowd, as well as by those loser betas and by "political correctness" and, of course, by "SJWs" (social justice warriors)... and about how men are being punished just for being men, damn it!... and about how Tony Robbins is just the latest high-profile example of this unconscionable oppression.

It gets worse, though. A cursory Google search led me to
a toxic little essay by American Nazi Andrew Anglin, originally published on his neo-Nazi Daily Stormer site, though that original link appears to be down. The headline blasts, "Tony Robbins' Book Canceled Because He's Too Alpha." (Apparently Anglin didn't get the memo that it wasn't, technically, "Tony Robbins' book.")

The screed leads with a pic of Robbins embellished with one of his famous quotations: "The path to success is to take massive, determined action." To which Anglin responds:

Not anymore, Tony. Not anymore. Today, the path to success is to take massive cocks in every orifice, and to have new orifices surgically added to your body so you can take massive cocks in those too.
He goes on to hurl blame at "sluts" (presumably feminists, as well as the women of the #MeToo movement and every woman who has ever sympathized or empathized with the latter); black people (though of course he doesn't use nearly so polite a term); and trans people (though he employs a far cruder term). And, he adds, "if you cross a slut or a mangina, the entire world will come down on you. Even if you're a diabolical genius who invented modern self-help ideology." Tony Robbins, of course, is precisely that "diabolical genius."


The glory days of alpha male rule, Anglin laments, are gone. No longer do we exist in a world where alpha males can express their alpha maleness by "whip(ping) out their dicks" and "grabbing bitches by the pussy" and telling "rape-hoaxing sluts to shut their filthy lying mouths." Why, alphas can't even use the "N" word with impunity, he rages, a complaint that appears to address the third BuzzFeed story, which reported on an old video of Robbins using the "N" word repeatedly at a seminar exercise whose stated purpose was to rob racial epithets of their power. As disgusting as that may be to most folks when viewed today, Anglin seems to be... well, anglin'... for a world in which those epithets would still have their full power, and alpha white guys could use them without facing any consequences.

Still frothing, Anglin continues:

The disgusting part of this is that Tony Robbins actually was giving people great advice. It was very simple advice, ultimately - he was just saying clichéd stuff about “reach for the stars and always be the best you can be, and you will succeed at whatever endeavor you take on.”

And you can criticize him for saying something that has been said before - but you can’t call him a liar.

The fact of reality is that your only choices are:

  1. Live in fear
  2. Grab life by the pussy
There really aren't any other major choices, and there is very little gray area.
I'm thinking that #NotMyPresident Donald Trump should be extraordinarily proud that he has inspired no lesser a Nazi than Andrew Anglin to turn a 2005 hot-mic boast into a metaphor for how to live one's life. Maybe Trump and Anglin can co-author a ghostwritten book called, Grab Life By The Pussy! Although come to think of it, I don't think Trump would want to share author credits with anyone, so scrap that idea.

For that matter,
Anglin's former lawyer, free-screech advocate Marc Randazza, should also be proud to count Anglin among his stellar former client list. I say "former" lawyer/client because, although Randazza was indeed representing Anglin in November 2018 when I wrote the blog post linked to in the previous sentence, he has since begged off the case. Luke O'Brien had this to say in the HuffPost in April of this year:
This is not the first time Randazza has slunk away from his legal wreckage -- last year, he withdrew from a case after he and a client made numerous misrepresentations in Utah federal court that led to his client being sanctioned. This breakup, though, is different. For a time, Randazza and Anglin were pals subverting the system together. But Anglin was always too far gone, a conspiratorial loon raving about Jewish cabalism, his hatred of America and his desire to see the brains of his enemies splattered on walls.

“He has gotten far more radical,” Randazza told HuffPost in March.
"Gotten" far too radical? Okay, whatever you say, Marc.

But I digress. Anglin, ignoring the fact that the subject of his rant is not in fact down for the count (though Anglin apparently bases his view of Robbins' "downfall" on the fact that Robbins has actually made half-hearted apologies and concessions here and there, which a functional alpha male would never, ever do), concludes in his little essay that Tony Robbins may well be "the last 1990s Alpha Male Extremist to fall to the disgusting hordes" of women and people of color and LGBTQ and so forth. But, he adds, while this is a cause for mourning, all is not lost. Rather it is a sign that "we, the men among the ruins, must rebuild our own new society" from scratch.

"I can promise you this," he assures his readers. "There'll be plenty of chances to whip out your dick on the road to a new civilization."


Well, I say, go ahead and whip it out, MRAs, and keep it out. Just ignore the hearty laughter you encounter on the road to that brave new civilization, and do be on the lookout for women with axes to grind. Or just with axes.

By contrast to Anglin, MRA (and self-described alpha), misogynist, alt-right Trumpian, and conspiranoid
Mike Cernovich almost sounded rational in a post he wrote in response to the initial BuzzFeed revelations. Though as might be expected Cernovich downplayed the actual accusations, he did manage to make a couple of valid points about Robbins' history of engaging in "aggressive litigation posturing" and the use of "bottom-feeding lawyers to silence his critics." He also expressed the opinon that Robbins was being too sensitive about the accusations in the BuzzFeed articles, and that he overreacted to them. Most of all Cernovich touched on a point that I've previously made:
No one who likes Robbins will read the article and think, “That’s it. He’s cancelled.”
Yeah... you know... barking dogs and caravans. Cernovich concluded with another salient observation, which is that like most celebs, Robbins has been coddled by the media for decades, "and any criticism leads to an overreaction."

So even a card-carrying member of the right-wing alphabutt manopshere can occasionally exhibit a thread of rationality.


Where (or if) it stops, nobody knows...
One of the ongoing themes on this blog is that in Scamworld there are no neat and tidy endings. As I've noted more than once in the past couple of posts, I really don't think the BuzzFeed series will mark the end of Tony Robbins' career as a huckster.
A possible, though by no means certain, Achilles heel could be the allegations related to #MeToo matters, which have, after all, led to the downfall of numerous successful and powerful men, and possibly a few women, in various industries and in public office -- Donald John Trump being a notable exception, so far.
 
But then again, placed in the context of what has been going on with selfish-help gurus and "spiritual" leaders for decades, and given the fact that the selfish-help/McSpirituality industries have weathered many other allegations of physical and emotional abuse, nothing is certain. Yes, women (and men) are finally saying, "Enough!", and as a culture we are becoming less tolerant of bad behavior that was formerly taken for granted. However, absent an extreme situation like Keith Rainier and his sex-slavery cult, or like James Arthur Ray and his lethal sweat lodge, it's unlikely that any of Tony Robbins' misdeeds -- or, for that matter, the misdeeds of most other motivational icons -- will result in any criminal charges or even many successful civil actions. And while Robbins and others may lose some fans and followers for one reason or another, you can't keep a good huckster down, and there will always be new generations of marks.

But please, don't waste any time feeling sorry for Tony Robbins. Just continue to keep your eyes open and your boots on as you continue to negotiate (to quote a certain Cosmic blogger) the dung-filled streets and murky swamps of pop culture. It's a mess out there.


UPDATE, 6 December 2019:
Buzzfeed published yet another installment in its Tony Robbins series on November 22, 2019 --
that's Part 6, for those who are keeping track. This story covered Robbins' alleged sexual abuse of a minor female at a summer camp in Southern Cali way back in 1985, when Tony was 25, but already rich and famous.

Following the publication of that piece, Tony, who denies the allegations, had apparently had enough.
He has now decided to SLAPP Buzzfeed with a flawsuit, and is currently threatening to sue Twitter too in the bargain, apparently for allowing word of the Buzzfeed series to spread. But he's not suing in the United States; rather, he's suing in Ireland, with his lawyer rationalizing that Dublin is Twitter's Euro headquarters. Per Mike Masnick, writing on the TechDirt site on December 4:
Of course, the real reason to sue in Ireland is because either lawsuit would be laughed out of court in the US. The bar to prove defamation against a public figure like Robbins would make it nearly impossible for Robbins to win a defamation lawsuit here, unless he could somehow prove that Buzzfeed made up the reporting, which seems highly unlikely. And, of course, Section 230 of the CDA would protect Twitter. Even in Europe, it seems unlikely that Twitter could be held liable for how other people tweeted, just because Mr. Robbins is "aggrieved" about how this story spread.
Meanwhile, Buzzfeed continues to stand by their reporting.

Related on (and off) this Whirled

On-Whirled:
Off-Whirled:
  • September 2018: Enough with the ludicrous "alpha male" myth, says author James Fell, writing on The Good Men Project blog. Not that this will dissuade many if any of those who most need dissuading, but this is for the rest of us.

  • Updated September 2018: Here's Why Tony Robbins Should Definitely Not Be Your Guru
    Some really powerful observations in response to the 2016 Netflix documentary, Tony Robbins: I Am Not Your Guru. The author, Mia Doring, describes Tony as "a raging 'self help' narcissist," writing:

    I had hoped there was more to him than this, but the Netflix documentary “I Am Not Your Guru” (weird title considering that’s exactly what he thinks he is) didn’t really convince me, or anyone else I have foisted it upon.
    She describes a scene in which Robbins coerces a woman to break up with her boyfriend on the phone in front of 2,500 people at one of his "Date With Destiny" seminars.
    She wants Robbins’ approval so badly that it hurts to watch. “Pick up your f*ckin’ phone”, he says dismissively, walking away, smirking. As he lectures her about the relationship he knows nothing about, he occasionally shrugs his shoulders in apparent exasperation with her. She fumbles in her bag. Of course nobody is making her do anything. Just her intense desire to please the giant man shouting “f*cking” commands at her, the several TV cameras all pointed at her, and the palpable energy of the giant crowd all around her, all who see this as a “breakthrough”. Oh and the $5K she spent to be there. Her boyfriend hangs up on her. The music blasts. She gets a standing ovation. She looks devastated. Tony gives a little speech about being “authentic”. I want to shoot myself in the face.
  • November 2014: From The Guardian: Infomercial king Tony Robbins wants to tell you what to do with your money. Be very afraid
    Not related to sexual abuse allegations, but about Tony Robbins' unfitness to be a financial guru.

  • September 2010: Salty Droid on Tony Robbins and the Syndicate
    Going back even further than the 2015 Salty Droid post I linked to above, here's more about Tony Robbins teaming up with a group of aggressive second-rate scammers who referred to themselves as "The [Internet Marketing] Syndicate" to suck as many folks as possible into a fraud funnel. Salty explained:
    [Robbins] will “introduce” you to [the members of "The Syndicate"] for $67 per month … but if you want to know about the cartel … and the fraud … and the
    boiler rooms … and all the other seedy fucking bullshit that these wanks have to pull just to make far less than they report … then that’s gonna be extra.
    Again, this has nothing to do with scandalous #MeToo-type allegations that have dominated the headlines about Robbins since BuzzFeed's first story was published. But it is equally as scandalous and should be treated as such.
* * * * *
Now more than ever, your donation is needed
to help keep this Whirled spinning.
Click here to donate via PayPal or debit/credit card.
If that link doesn't work, send PayPal payment directly to

scrivener66@hotmail.com
or to
cosmic.connie@juno.com
If PayPal, be sure to specify that your contribution is a gift. Thank you!

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Tony baloney: Buzzfeed's Robbins exposé only a shocker for those who weren't paying attention

By now you've probably heard about Buzzfeed News' investigative series on selfish-help giant (in more ways than one) Tony Robbins. The first installment -- and the one that elicited the most reaction from the news media and even prompted a rapid response from Tony himself -- was published on May 17, complete with a large animation that alternated between an image of a hugely smiling "normal" Tony and that of a sinister, malevolently grinning Devil-red caricature. The headline screamed:

Leaked Records Reveal Tony Robbins Berated Abuse Victims, And Former Followers Accuse Him Of Sexual Advances

Buzzfeed has thus far published two additional and somewhat anti-climactic pieces in their investigative series on Robbins: the second one reporting that four additional women had come forward with accusations against him, and the third installment documenting that a very young Robbins had been filmed using racial slurs. Granted, in context it appears to me after an admittedly cursory review that the racial slur accusation may be stretching things a little bit: however misguided and lacking in application in the real world it may have been, Tony was apparently just trying to lead some event attendees in an exercise to strip racial epithets of their power by shouting them over and over and laughing at their absurdity. But racism, like most serious problems that selfish-help gurus so often try to address via shocky (or schlocky) showmanship, is not that easily solved... so it was still kind of a stupid thing to do.

Immediately following the publication of the first piece in Buzzfeed, Robbins, not surprisingly, bit back,
attacking Buzzfeed in an "open letter" on Medium. He boasted about all of the many millions of people -- including dead celebrities such as Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa, Princess Diana, and various world leaders -- whom he'd helped over the years. He acknowledged that his "open-classroom therapeutic methods" are not for everyone, but he denied ever behaving in the "reckless, irresponsible, or malicious" ways that the Buzzfeed "storytellers" alleged. He insinuated that most of the accusations concerned behavior from decades ago and were therefore irrelevant. But the main thrust of his response was to attack Buzzfeed and attempt to discredit it. He accused the reporters of engaging in unfair and possibly illegal tactics, and insisted that they had a predetermined agenda to bring him down.

One Robbins follower, who though not explicitly named in the first Buzzfeed story insisted that her info about an intervention incident was misused by the reporters, has hired lawyers and threatens to sue Buzzfeed if they do not remove the content that she says relates to her. In his own "open letter" on Medium, Robbins shared her "Tony is my hero and Buzzfeed is unfair" vid, and he linked to her video not one, not two, but three different times in his missive without indicating that he was using the same source repeatedly. It was all apparently in the service of making the anti-Buzzfeed contingent seem larger.

Not that Tony really needed to do that. He had plenty of reinforcements; also unsurprisingly, his fans rushed to defend him and condemn Buzzfeed,
e.g., on Twitter.

But
Buzzfeed stands by their reporting. A spokesman for Buzzfeed told The Daily Beast:
“Our reporting is based on records of Mr. Robbins berating victims of rape and domestic violence, and the testimony of former staffers and followers who accused him of inappropriate sexual advances. It does not appear that Mr. Robbins read the story itself before he published his open letter, which contains a number of demonstrably false and defamatory claims about both our reporting and the resulting article.”
The only news is that it really isn't news
When the Buzzfeed story first broke it created quite a stir not just among some of the news and entertainment media but also among many ordinary folks, including some in my own small social media network, who expressed shock and disbelief that such an iconic figure could have been even remotely involved in the alleged misdeeds. How could this be? they wondered, and taking a cue from Tony himself, many of his fans have simply chalked it up to more "fake news."

One friend of mine who is a fan of Robbins' work seemed to be wrestling with the question of whether or not to remain a fan should the allegations be true. I lamely suggested an attempt to separate the message from the messenger, but that was actually a silly response, and my friend Tim called me on it by noting that manipulation, deceit, and scamming comprise the foundation of Robbins' entire shtick. Another person on my Facebook timeline dismissed the whole thing outright, saying that the accusers were clearly just a bunch of jealous wannabes. (But the latter person also thinks that pretty much all rape or sexual abuse accusations are false, so you have to consider the source.)

 
To some of us, though, the Buzzfeed story came as no surprise. This is not to give short shrift to Buzzfeed's efforts, but c'mon, folks, there have been numerous
controversies and legal issues around Robbins for decades. Granted, Robbins himself has seemed to put considerable effort into quashing critical content in print and online, sometimes via litigation or threats thereof, but he has had his share of critics who have, in their own ways, documented much of his questionable behavior over the years. That "squeaky clean image" that some of the current crop of commentators insist he has maintained isn't all that clean, to those who are paying attention anyway.

And certainly the Buzzfeed allegations that Tony berated sexual abuse victims should be no surprise, in light of last year's kerfuffle over his tone-deaf statements and subsequent bumbling apologies regarding the #MeToo movement.
Here is one of hundreds of accounts of that..

Beyond that, those of us who have been observing selfish-help/New-Wage/McSpirituality luminaries for many years know that sexual harassment and predation are some of the worst-kept secrets in those "industries." There is so little accountability in these fields, and there are so many vulnerable and broken people who are on a constant quest for validation and will gladly accept it from even the dodgiest of sources.

Of course these problems also exist in numerous other industries and institutions involving unequal power dynamics: boss-employee, schoolteacher-student, film producer-actor; traditional religious leader-parishioner/congregation member; politician-aide... you get the drift. The temptation to take advantage of one's position of power is often too great to resist, and when celebrity is added to the mix it's quite often even easier to take advantage. Grab 'em by the pussy,
as someone infamously said...

This is not to deny that sometimes the "less powerful" parties are the initiators; even minor celebrities have groupies and obsessed fans who aggressively pursue them, and the selfish-help industry is no exception. Women as well as men can be very aggressive in their pursuits when they are obsessed. (As well, women in positions of power can and do take advantage of "less powerful" men, so don't think that I am framing this as simply a #believewomen issue.) Nor am I overlooking the fact that many interactions are, however distasteful or ill-advised, consensual. And I'm certainly not trying to deny that even those who strive for lofty positions of leadership are imperfect human beings, as Robbins described himself in his open letter, as sort of a blanket exoneration of any of his own dickweedish behavior. But as I've noted in other contexts, the onus is on the "more powerful" party to avoid taking advantage of fans or groupies or students or aides or parishioners or other obsessed, vulnerable, or broken people.

Moreover, even absent actual sexual harassment/predation, the egotism, arrogance, and sociopathy of many in the selfish-help industry is pretty well documented. I've addressed some of these issues previously on this blog; see additional links at the end of this post.


And beyond all of that... as I mentioned in passing above, Tony Robbins is an inveterate huckster and a serial scammer, pure and simple, and if you do not see that by now, I am not going to expend much effort trying to convince you. Do your own research. Suffice to say that Tony has his huge fingers in a lot of pies; in addition to his own progressively more pricey shticks, which you'd think that would be enough, he also isn't above
promoting the frauducts and flopportunities of far lesser but no less scummy scammers. That link in the previous sentence leads to a 2010 post by my long-time friend and blogging colleague (and now working lawyer) Jason "Salty Droid" Jones, who has documented some of Robbins' scams in exquisite detail. Here's a link to a list of all of his posts tagged "Tony Robbins." I'm guessing that Jason is one of those who was not at all surprised by what Buzzfeed uncovered.

Another person who was completely unsurprised not only by the Buzzfeed series, but also by the #MeToo v Tony conflict last year, is James Fell, of the "Body For Wife" blog. In the wake of the #MeToo flap, Fell wrote a post entitled,
"Tony Robbins Has Always Been Shitty." The title sums it up quite nicely, but the post is worth a read for it presents yet another snapshot of Robbins' manipulative, coercive, and just plain dickweedy seminar techniques, and his relentless and aggressive upselling. Wrote Fell:
Guys like Tony are the worst kind of “guru,” in that they’re only half full of shit. Also known as telling half-truths and packaging stuff that is logical in a mystical aura of rainbows and puppy hugs and para-psychological nonsense with scientific-sounding names. But it’s all just a way to suck money out of your wallet by merging legitimacy with the miraculous. As I said, these people will motivate you down to your last dollar. They tell you how you’re broken, then sell you the “fix.”

Lest you think Fell is a just another cynic about the self-help field, you're wrong.

Does this mean all work in the field of motivation is bogus? Hardly. It means don’t get it from a guy pushing pseudoscience whose greatest accomplishment is convincing millions he is great at accomplishing things.

Tony gives self-improvement a bad name. But there is plenty of legitimate behavior change science people can use for the betterment of their lives, and I’ve written about a lot of it over the years, interviewing respected experts with real PhDs from real universities. I’m personally fond of self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory. I also find value in the theory of planned behavior.

Alas, it’s sensationalism that sells. If you desire self-improvement, avoid that which is popular or sexy, and seek out the real science. It won’t keep trying to upsell you or blast anything up your ass as you walk on fire while wearing a bullshit pendant made from a few bucks worth of cheap materials.
Yet another blogger, my pal Andrew "Duff" McDuffee, wrote a series of essays on Robbins and the "cult of aggressive positivity" back in June 2010. I've cited Duff's work previously but it's pertinent here too. Here's a link to Part 1.

In any case, regarding the current Buzzfeed series, I think the writer of
a May 18 Quartz piece nailed it when she wrote that whether or not any or all of the allegations against Tony Robbins are true...
...it’s certain that Robbins now finds himself in an awkward position. He rails against victimization and urges followers to overcome the obstacles of their past—whether it’s childhood abuse, rape, poverty, or other difficult circumstances—for tomorrow’s possibilities. That’s a central tenet of his guidance. Now he’ll have to embrace these lessons, too: If he displays too much self-pity over the negative coverage, he risks seeming like a hypocrite in addition to everything else he may or may not be.
"Seeming like a hypocrite?" I'd say that train has already left the station. In any event it appears that so far, Robbins isn't playing the self-pity game as much as he is trading in faux sadness and muted outrage: planting, with a few carefully chosen sentences that range from the snarky to the histrionic, the seeds of indignation in the faithful, who are taking up the mantle of his defense and vociferously condemning Buzzfeed. The fan base seems to be doing most of the heavy lifting for him for the time being, though I wouldn't rule out Robbins resorting to litigation at some point.

I will say this, however, as I believe I've previously declared here: I did like Tony Robbins in
the Jack Black movie Shallow Hal. That is my attempt to be fair and balanced here.

And now that we've gotten fair and balanced out of the way, let's be realistic. Again, this is not to undermine the efforts of the Buzzfeed reporters, but frankly I don't really think that the publication of their work marks any sort of turning point, or that it will shock a critical mass of vulnerable folks awake and that as a result they will decide never to hand over any money or emotional currency to a selfish-help huckster again. In the greater scheme of things, despite the shock of the seemingly "untouchable" Tony Robbins being the target of a critical investigation... probably little will change. The devotees will continue to throng to Tony's expensive mega-events, he will continue to sell and promote his own (and select others') frauducts and flopportunities, he will continue to exploit his own celebrity status in any way he sees fit, and, of course, he will continue to make money hand over fist.

As I've said so many times before, quoting an increasingly annoying but nonetheless accurate maxim: The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.


Related on this Whirled:
  • Re sexual predation being one of the worst kept secrets in the selfish-help/New-Wage/McSpirituality industries; though this long piece is slightly dated (as noted in the disclaimer at the beginning), it still lends relevant perspective to some of the above:
    February 2016 --
    The hatriarchy: musings on rape culture, xenophobia, racism and other nasty business (especially under "Rape culture in the New-Wage world," but other sections are relevant too)

  • Some folks say that when a guru or idol's bad behavior enters the picture, it's still possible to "separate the message from the messenger." Here's why that isn't always possible or wise, even if the "message" itself isn't also bogus (which it so often is). In retrospect, and in light of the #MeToo movement, I may have cut too much slack for entertainment celebrities and politicians regarding codes of behavior, but overall I think the message in this post is valid.
    November 2009 --
    The lies that blind

  • Tony Robbins insists that his "open-classroom therapeutic methods" aren't for everyone, but that they have helped millions. But people can be and are emotionally, psychologically, and even physically harmed (and sometimes even killed) at LGAT (large group awareness training) events such as those that Robbins conducts/sponsors. The issue of regulation in the self-help industry is still a controversial one; I tried to offer some perspective a few years ago.
    March 2010 --
    Self-help regulation: necessary safeguard or Nanny-state nonsense?

  • More perspective on emotional, physical and sexual abuse by a faux-guru, in this case, James Arthur Ray, who is responsible for the deaths of four people and the injuries of numerous others at his own events.
    October 2010 --
    Musings on a tragedy and its meanings

  • Some consider Tony Robbins to be a "life coach." But "life coaching," like other segments of the self-help industry, has more than its share of unqualified practitioners who are playing with people's lives as well as their pocketbooks.
    April 2007 --
    Is the word "coaching" or "ka-ching?"

  • The Buzzfeed reporters wrote about the carefully structured physical and emotional environment at Tony Robbins' intensive events, citing several factors from uncomfortable room temperatures to long grueling hours, all of which were crafted to make attendees more vulnerable to manipulation. These factors are hardly unique to Robbins, though. The folks who ran current Scammer in Chief Donald Trump's bogus "university" were working from the same playbook, as do lots of other hucksters.
    May 2016 --
    Donald Trump's Scamworld playbook isn't unique
* * * * *
Now more than ever, your donation is needed
to help keep this Whirled spinning.
Click here to donate via PayPal or debit/credit card.
If that link doesn't work, send PayPal payment directly to

scrivener66@hotmail.com
or to
cosmic.connie@juno.com
If PayPal, be sure to specify that your contribution is a gift. Thank you!