Showing posts with label Rene Rivkin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rene Rivkin. Show all posts

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Hot tub slime machine

Last month I wrote about the recent revitalization of a Facebook fan page, as well as other new web content, devoted to previously imprisoned/currently on "home confinement" serial scammer Kevin Trudeau, aka KT, aka Katie on this Whirled. After a hiatus of several months, new content has been appearing on the Facebook fan page, mostly with motivational/inspirational themes centered around Katie's teachings. But the main purpose of the page seems to be to inspire people to send money to help support Kevin, and to motivate them to join what remains of the seekrit club he founded, GIN (the Global Information Network).

I check in on the fan page every few days or so, and
on August 20 this brief post appeared:

How many times have we heard Kevin say 'dream a dream so big it would take ten lifetimes to accomplish'?

Would you like to know how big Kevin's dreams are? Read the vision for 'The Ship':
https://kevintrudeaufanclub.com/the-ship
Read the vision for 'The Club':
https://kevintrudeaufanclub.com/the-club

Well, there are some big problems with this post about big dreams, apart from the fact that Kevin's "vision" for "The Club" is really nothing more than recycled content from the early daze of GIN, when the same lengthy list of lofty goals was presented to members, and aside from the tiny little detail that "The Ship" is creepily Scientology-like. (I discussed both points at some length in this December 2019 Whirled post; see under the sub-head, "Kevin's big dream: life on a cruise ship, and a new club with even less accountability than the old GIN").

To me, the issue with the August 20 fan page post lies not so much with the verbiage, which is pretty much the standard fangirl/fanboy gushing that we've come to expect from this and similar pages, and which was more than likely directed by Kevin himself from the safety of his "home confinement" situation. The real problem is the rub-a-dub-dub-three-men-in-a-hot-tub image accompanying the post. Maybe Kevin himself specifically wanted that pic, or maybe the writer of the post took the liberty of choosing it out of hundreds in the archives. I guess it doesn't matter. But if it was selected with the intent to illustrate the concept of dreaming "a dream so big that it would take ten lifetimes to accomplish," it fails on several levels.

To begin with, and let's just get this out of the way first, it's really quite silly. It's also a very old pic -- ancient, in Internet time. Although when I first published this post I wrote that I did not know exactly how old the picture is, but that I knew it had to be before 2005, someone in a very good position to know has since informed me that it was taken circa New Years 2000 in Sydney, Australia. (In case you're wondering where I got the photo, it's in Kevin Trudeau's Flickr collection, specifically in the "Business As Usual With Kevin Trudeau" album; here's the direct link to the photo. As you'll see if you follow that direct link, the site indicates that the photo was taken on July 15, 2011, but even if the person in the know had not informed me of the correct date, I would have known that it couldn't have possibly been taken that recently. You'll see why in a few moments, if you haven't already guessed.)

And while I speculate that the pic is intended to portray a complacently successful Kevin just chillin' with similarly accomplished buddies in a hot tub on what one can imagine is somebody's luxury yacht, chomping on what one can only assume are outrageously expensive cigars... is that image really the most compellingly seductive depiction of the giddy heights of success that Kevin has been promising to deliver to his followers for decades, if they are only willing to pledge their life savings and their eternal fealty to him? More to the point of this particular post, is it truly representative of Kevin's grand "visions" of "The Ship" and "The Club?"

I will concede that there's a vaguely nautical theme, so while it may be a stretch, I guess you could say that it is suggestive of "The Ship" -- but all in all it seems kind of lame from a materialistic standpoint, while at the same time being hopelessly mundane and even a tad vulgar in light of that whole enlightened-guru image that Kevin and the minions have been flogging for at least a year and a half. I imagine it can be a challenge to market to diverse demographics: spiritual seekers and the conspicuously enlightened as well as greedy or envious materialists and
scammer wannabes. (This is not to say that one can't be both a conspicuously enlightened type and a scammer wannabe, since Scamworld is rife with hyper-materialistic McSpirituality types, but I digress.)

On the other hand, maybe the picture is merely intended to portray something more abstract, such as the simple heartfelt joys of kicking back with good pals, fellow members of an elite group of folks who have Realized Their Dreams. But there's a problem with portraying these particular friends, or at least one of them.

The guy on the right hand side of the photo is Kevin himself, of course, and if you overlook the fact that he's currently serving out a ten-year federal prison sentence, and that his water carriers claim he's utterly penniless and needs you to send him money, I suppose you could say he's successful by the traditional Scamworld definitions of "success" embraced by the shallow, the crass, and the naive.

The bloke in the middle is the UK's
Andrew Malcher of High Street TV, a "multi-channel retail group." He sells stuff, in other words. Lots and lots and lots of stuff, apparently. He was also involved in various ventures that included Kevin Trudeau in the past. Hustle, hustle, hustle.

It's the guy on the left who should make you raise your eyebrows. That would be the late Rene Walter Rivkin, Australia's most notorious insider trader. (If you thought that the worst Oz had to offer in the way of crooks was investment fraudster and star of The Secret (he was the car-park guy) David Schirmer, think again.) It was on Rivkin's boat that the Trudeau hot tub party apparently took place.

For Rivkin, though, the party was most likely on its way to being over even at that time, because his troubles were steadily mounting, resulting in misery to his family as well as to himself. Finally on May Day 2005, at the age of 60, he committed suicide at his elderly mother's home, where he had been living. He had already attempted suicide the previous year and by all accounts was not a happy man at all. And no wonder: he had been battling a shipload of legal problems that resulted in the permanent revocation of his stockbroking license, as well as a slew of health challenges, including benign brain tumors, a gangrenous gall bladder, deep vein thrombosis and bipolar disorder.

I've mentioned Rene Rivkin a couple of times on this Whirled, years ago: in passing in
this September 2013 post, and in a bit more detail in this May 2014 offering (see under the sub-head, "The infomercial wizards of Oz"). In the latter post I linked to a June 2000 piece on Australia's Media Watch site about the infomercial partnership between Kevin and Rene. As co-directors of the Rivkin Group, the two spewed out infomercials together back in the day for Shop America (Australasia), hustling everything from memory techniques and weight loss schemes to Rivkin's own scams, including his stock market report "and other more magical products" targeted to the Australian TV public.

Their go-to technique was the phony interview, geared to make viewers think they were watching actual programming in the style of the then-popular Larry King Live (which of course is no longer a thing, especially since Larry King is dead). Trudeau had gotten himself into a spot of trouble with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for, among other things, using that technique in his infomercials for American audiences, and the FTC required him to tell viewers that his "talk shows" were in fact paid advertisements. In Oz, though, he and his grift-buddy were still able to get by with the ruse, at least for a while, until Australia also passed laws to better protect consumers.

In any case Rivkin was thrilled with Kevin's magic touch, gushing:

From first hand witnessing of Kevin in action, I can tell you he truly is a marketing phenomenon....You may have seen us on TV. The results have been excellent.
(The Rivkin Report, issue 133)

Clearly he didn't care at all about Kevin's criminal "past." In a June 2000 letter to Media Watch, Rivkin wrote:

I am of course aware of [Trudeau's] criminal record...I am also and have always been acutely aware of Mr Trudeau's past...suffice to say I remain of the very strong view that people with criminal records are capable of rehabilitation.

That was then, and there's been a lot of water under the bridge since then, with Rivkin ultimately succumbing to his own inner demons and Trudeau going on to create bigger scams and, finally, a bigger prison sentence for himself than he'd accomplished at the time Rivkin knew him.

More recently, in August of 2019, Institutional Investor published a profile on Rene Rivkin by David Wilson,
"The Down Under Scammer You've Probably Never Heard Of." Wilson described Rivkin as Australia's "singularly tragic version" of both mega-fraudster Bernie Madoff (who at the time the piece was published was still alive and was begging #NeverWasMyPresident Trump to commute his 150-year prison sentence) and notorious sex predator/trafficker and Trump buddy Jeffrey Epstein (who had just died in prison of apparent suicide). Wilson wrote that when Rivkin was sentenced to a mere nine months of weekend detention stints, even that relatively lenient sentence was still cause for "national gloating" in Australia; the lead story in the Sydney Morning Herald crowed, "Cell, cell, cell." Had Rivkin not ended his life, Wilson speculated, he might have ended up serving considerably more time.

For one thing, he was also a suspect in a seamy murder case and the recipient of a lavish insurance payout under suspicious circumstances. And he allegedly offloaded stocks that his newsletter, the Rivkin Report, tipped. Last, despite having untold wealth hidden in the Swiss banking system, Rivkin owed the taxman millions. 

His memory still casts a tailored shadow across the Australian investment landscape, because the “guru of greed” was such an epic character: a high-octane, cigar-smoking, Prozac-popping Sydney-sider dubbed “
Australia’s most aggressive broker.” Some even labeled him messianic based on his grandiose claims of persecution, going so far as to compare his criminal conviction to the crucifixion of Jesus. 

I suppose it was only natural for Rene Rivkin to be good buddies with Kevin Trudeau, who has compared his own trials and tribulations to those of Jesus Christ, Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and other martyrs.

But you know what? Nothing about Rivkin's sad story probably matters at all to Kevin's most loyal minions, who will continue to praise Trudeau as the savior of humanity and a key to making all of their dreams come true. Someone told me years ago that Kevin himself had spoken of Rivkin as a tragic example of skewed values and poor choices. Maybe so, but the fact remains that Kevin Trudeau continues in a multitude of ways to promote many of those same cockeyed values, leading countless followers to make poor choices themselves. For the vast majority, those choices may not result in prison sentences and hopefully not in suicide, but GIN did, by many accounts, leave a trail of empty bank accounts and damaged lives, and call me cynical, but I really don't believe that Katie has changed in any significant way.

Related on this Whirled:

  •  July 2021: Serial scammer Kevin Trudeau: new websites, same old hustle
    I'm adding this link again, though it was embedded above, because the point needs to be emphasized: Trudeau, through various proxies, is begging for money, which the minions claim he could very well earn for himself once he gets out of prison, but (according to their narrative), instead of money-grubbing he intends to devote his life to "serving humanity." Don't buy it.
  • March 2021: El-Ron is dead. Long Live Kevin Trudeau!
    Kevin's big "vision" of "The Ship" didn't just spring up spontaneously. More than likely it's at least partly related to his longtime affection for Scientology (not to mention his desire to get the hell out of US government jurisdiction as soon as he possibly can).
  • December 2020: Spotify series "Fraudsters" tackles Kevin Trudeau in 3 parts
    While it may seem that much of the world has forgotten about Trudeau for the time being, not everyone has. The Spotify series provides a good history of his life of fraud, including the big GIN scam.
  • August 2020: Whiny babies of Scamworld
    When he's not hustling scams and schemes, or waxing wisely McSpiritual, Trudeau is whining about his martyrdom. Of course he's not the only whiner in Scamworld...
  • March 2020: The Lie-land of Dr. Trudeau: Kevin Trudeau joins the ranks of the corona-crapitalists
    Fairly early into the COVID-19 pandemic, Kevin Trudeau hopped aboard the misinfo train, dictating "COVID-19 Updates" from prison that were faithfully recorded by the minions on his Facebook fan page and his current main web site. Though Trudeau billed his messages as exclusive information that "they" don't want you to know about and that was available nowhere else, the content was -- you guessed it -- little more than recycled stuff from the conspiranoid slush pile. In this post I go into some detail about the earlier "updates," and if you can stand to wade through it,
    there's also a link to some of Kevin's subsequent covidiocies.
  • January 2020: Kevin Trudeau asks Judge Robert Gettleman for post-prison scam guidance
    Just how much scamming will Kevin legally be able to do once he completes his sentence in either May or July 2022? In early 2020 he wrote a letter to the judge who'd presided over his civil case for many years, asking for guidance. To my knowledge, Judge Gettleman never answered him, but in any case this post contains a link to the original sentencing document, which provides general guidelines on what he will and won't be allowed to do.
  •  December 2019: Saint Kevin Trudeau becomes GuruKev as Facebook clamps down on is "celebrity" page
    Another one I linked to in the main post, but it needs to be emphasized. Expanding his brand as a "spiritual leader," Kevin and his devotees are really pouring it on thick about Kevin being an enlightened master, or some such: a source of wisdom that you just won't find anywhere else. Is he grooming the cult followers, or just cynically exploiting another avenue to material riches? More than likely it's both.
  • January 2015: Kevin Trudeau: an interview from the clink, and an attempt to take Business Insider for a ride
    Despite a few errors and omissions, which I discuss at length in this post, Aaron Gell's portrait of Trudeau for Business Insider remains one of the best and most comprehensive in recent years.

Monday, May 12, 2014

Kevin Trudeau: passport pleas and a piss-poor movie

So goodbye Yellow Brick Road
Where the scammers and predators howl
They've planted me in the jailhouse
There isn't much to do now

Maybe you'll get a replacement
There's plenty like me all around
Predators hungry for money
Sniffing for marks, who are easily found.

With
apologies to Bernie Taupin, Elton John, et al.


Even though he's behind bars, serial scammer Kevin Trudeau continues to provide entertainment for those of us who are easily amused -- even if he provides it unwittingly or in the most tangential way. But before we get to the rollicking fun, I should mention that as of the time I'm publishing this, people who object to the sale of the Global Information Network (GIN) assets to AXS Investment Group (or AXS Consulting, LLC) -- a group consisting of some of Kevin's bestest, most loyal buddies -- have less than an hour to file their objections with the court. Deadline is today (Monday, May 12, 2014) at 5:00 PM Central Daylight Time. I'll keep you posted.

Mama mia, Katie wants his passaporto!

Last week I found out,
and shared on Facebook, that Katie wants his passports back -- both his U.S. and Italiano passports. Or his lawyer does, anyway. The lawyer filed a motion with Judge Guzman's court on Thursday, May 8. Maybe it's for sentimental reasons. Or maybe Katie wants to put them in a scrapbook or on a vision board. Except I think they probably don't have scrapbooking and vision boards at the MCC.
Click to enlarge.

The gummit has till tomorrow, May 13, to respond to this motion. Katie's lawyers will be in court this Thursday, May 15, at 9:30 AM to present Katie's passport plea before Judge Guzman.


Naturally we are having some fun with this on Facebook. My friend Bernie O'Mahony of
GINtruth.com wrote, "Maybe he needs them in order to get from Cell Block B, to Cell Block D?" Tim Donohoe wrote: "In an unrelated motion, his lawyer has asked for his release from prison pending his appeal. Nothing to see here." In a subsequent remark Tim wrote, "Another idea is that maybe his lawyer needs access to some offshore accounts when his next bill is due."

I thought that there might be a specially infused seekrit magnetic strip in the passports that can override the biometry
in that biometric safe in Zurich where all sorts of seekrit things are hidden. As you may recall, last year Katie told the courts that he couldn't surrender his passports because they were in that safe in Zurich, but a little while later the passports mysteriously turned up anyway in Chicago. But suppose they really do contain some magickal seekrit strip and can help open that safe. What manner of treasure may be hidden therein? Next up: court docs demanding that whoever has his $6,400 cufflinks return them to his lawyers immediately.

By the way, on that passport motion Katie's lawyer, Thomas Kirsch, got the date of his client's criminal conviction wrong. It was November 12, 2013, not November 7, 2014. November 7, 2014 hasn't happened yet. But I guess I am not too surprised that Kirsch would get that detail wrong; he was the one who bungled Katie's criminal trial
by opening with that lame "cheesy moon" argument, and later on in the trial he and his team made the judge kind of mad.

UPDATE 13 May:
The government responded with an opposition to Kirsch's motion. Here is a link to that document. The government points out that the usual procedure with convicted criminals is to return their U.S. passports to the State Department, and any foreign passports to Homeland Security. It hasn't been done yet but the government expects that to happen. It also points out that by the time Trudeau is out on supervised release, his passports will have expired anyway.

UPDATE 15 May: Motion denied. Judge Guzman agrees with gummit and thinks that giving the passports to a third party might constitute a security risk. Here's that doc. (Note: I incorrectly titled the document 05-15-14; it was actually filed on 05-14-14.)

I still have to wonder why the lawyers wanted the passports badly enough to file a motion. But maybe this is much ado about little; perhaps it is just a routine thing for criminal lawyers to file to get all of their clients' documents back from Pretrial Services. Or... maybe Katie needs his passports to return to Oz.


Good buy Yellow Brick Road? Well, not so much.
The long-awaited animated movie, Legends of Oz:Dorothy's Return, was finally released theatrically across the US on Friday, May 9. This project was one of the "investment opportunities" offered by a couple of GIN members to other GIN members. My friend John Foster, an ex-Katie fan, former founding member of GIN and author of a new book about his GIN experiences and the scam GIN was, wrote on Facebook, "Investors spent around $100 million and [the movie] is opening in 1800 movie theaters. If it makes money it will be the first GIN opportunity that was promoted that made money."

There was a lot of skepticism about this movie when the discussions came up on Facebook last year, and one reason for the skepticism -- beyond the obvious fact that the "investment" op was being offered within the framework of GIN -- was that the folks involved with the production firms, Summertime Entertainment and Alpine Productions, have been involved in some dodgy business deals and have had some complaints made against them (more on that in a moment).
People were even getting spam phone calls from folks asking them to invest in the project. (Here is another link about that, from the same thread.)

But now that the project has indeed come to fruition, I would like to know if any of the GIN members who "invested" -- either the ones originally offering the opportunity to GIN members, or anyone else in GIN who took advantage of the "opportunity" -- will actually be making any money from the movie. My email box is open!


Of course they are buzzing about it
on the GIN Facebook pages: "In case you are not aware, a group of GIN Members utilized their training to help manifest the money to partially fund this movie."

Um-kay. But will they make any of that money back? Or was that even their intention in the first place? Inquiring minds want to know. I don't even know how to begin to pursue this matter because I don't think I ever knew the names of the GIN members who were pushing it. Can anyone help?


Brief update: A person in the know sent me a message clarifying that the Oz movie had nothing to do with GIN (which I knew), but the connection was simply that there was one GIN member pitching the project from the time he joined. He was able to pull a little money from a few members but nothing major. My source noted that on a conference call last week, Chris "Voldemort" McGarahan (one of the members of the group who is buying GIN) apparently gave GIN credit for raising all of the money for the film production -- which isn't even close to true, but even if it had been...well, it was nothing to brag about. And that gives this story double snarkitude points: for the fact that the GINvestors are claiming credit that they don't deserve, as well as for the fact that the movie they're taking so much credit for is an embarrassment (see next paragraph). Nice job, guys! [NOTE: See May 13 updates and addenda below. ~CC]
 

In any case the GINvestors who pitched in a few bucks should be very proud of themselves, because the movie is just getting splendid reviews. That is, if you define "splendid" as being "[An] eyeball-gougingly ugly, charm-free animated musical sequel, which is inexplicably opening in thousands of theaters instead of going direct to video." Or a movie that feels "like the cheaply made knockoffs you find in a dollar store: garishly shiny, flimsy and not built to last." As another reviewer wrote, "The bricks are still yellow, but the road doesn't lead anywhere special."

My friend Kenneth, another ex GIN member, said he went to see a movie this weekend but the show he wanted to see had sold out for the show time he wanted. He inquired about other movies and was told that aside from Spiderman, which only had a few tickets remaining, Legends of Oz had only a handful of people in it. "Needless to say, people had no interest in it whatsoever," he noted.


THIS JUST IN: Record breaking lousy debut at the box office (even worse than Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil)
.

But it's all sweetness and light on the official pages: the one for
Summertime Entertainment and for Legends of Oz.

Still, there were hard feelings along the way to production and release, as I suppose there often are in the movie biz.
Someone wrote a nasty note to Ripoff Report in October 2012.

And guess who wrote the rebuttal? One Marc J. Lane, whose law firm represented Summertime's Ryan and Roland Carroll and the production team behind the film.

As you may recall from reading this Whirled and various court documents and forums, Marc Lane was the asset protection lawyer who, as it happens, was hugely instrumental in helping Katie create and structure GIN.

Marc participated in social media buzz about the film while it was in production last year.
He was responding to this March 2013 post on "The Royal Blog of Oz," an Oz enthusiast blog. (By the way, after the fanfare on that blog, the actual movie review by one of the blog's team members was kind of anti-climactic.)

Marc also participated in one of the discussions about the spam phone calls that I mentioned above. Here's another page on that scam phone call thread. (It's basically the same spiel he wrote on the Ripoff Report thread.)

But Marc has been curiously silent about the movie on Facebook since its release, but he has "liked" several Oz-movie related pages... among other things. My goodness.


I can't say that I think Marc is a bad guy. I mean, lots of folks like porn; I don't think that's really that big a deal as long as it all involves consenting human adults. Besides, maybe the porn site people are clients of his. Or maybe a mischievous member of his household got into his Facebook account and "liked" that naughty page. There could be any number of explanations.

And judging from some of his Facebook posts Marc has a social conscience, or at least wants to make it appear that he does. In fact, when it comes to several issues regarding social and economic justice he appears to be embracing a side that is contrary to that embraced by most of the one percent. I like that in a person. But I have to wonder what sort of "conscience" or moral compass allowed him to participate so extensively in helping Kevin Trudeau create a scammy scheme such as GIN. I'm told by those who seem to be in a position to know that Marc gave Kevin sound advice that was well within legal frameworks, but that Kevin chose to ignore a lot of it and did as he pleased, and that was what caused all the trouble. I'm only halfway buying that. Because, really... Kevin Trudeau? Well-known lifelong scammer? Seriously, Marc, what were you thinking?

At any rate, my understanding is that various investigations are still ongoing. I've alternately been told that Marc isn't out of the woods yet regarding the Trudeau investigations, and that he is out of the woods because he cooperated with the Feds and didn't do anything with criminal intent. That story is still unfolding. I know only small parts of it and have reported what I know.

But I would not be surprised to learn that Marc Lane may have somehow been involved in the push for GIN members to invest in that animated boondoggle. If anyone has any insights into this I'll be glad to add that info to this post, and of course you can remain anon if you wish.

The infomercial wizards of Oz
Speaking of Oz, which also happens to be another name for Australia, I wonder if the investigators were ever able to uncover any more of
Katie's hidden assets Down Under, which the receivers were going on and on about last September.

And partly because my mind is jumping around all over the place today, but mostly because so many of these stories are interrelated in some way (because they are all part of the same, much larger and grimmer story), I'm reminded of another Oz character and Katie b.f.f., the late Rene Rivkin, who killed himself in 2005 and whose assets were also mysteriously hidden. He and Katie had a few things going together, for a while.

I think the authorities finally gave up looking for Rene's riches. But something tells me that if the right authorities did a little more digging, they might be able to find some more Rivkin assets as well as some more Katie assets -- in some cases, maybe even under the same rocks.
[Although someone who knew Rivkin just told me that it's very doubtful if he had anything left, which may have been one reason he ended his life. Tragic story, there.] Anyway, I really should get off of my duff and finish that half-finished Rivkin post that's been in the hopper for a year or so. But I'll leave you with a pretty picture for now -- Rene and Katie and someone else (maybe one of you can tell me who it is?) in happier days. Rub-a-dub-dub!



Update: Someone just tipped me off that the other guy in the tub is the UK's Andrew Malcher, currently of High Street TV, "the leading multi channel retailer of direct response TV products." Here's a July 2012 article about him in the UK's Financial Times). From the article:

If the mark of a great retailer is not selling you what you want but selling you what you didn’t know you wanted, Andrew Malcher must be a great retailer.
And here's a November 2013 article about High Street and Alliance Health Care signing a lucrative As Seen On TV-ish agreement. High Street has also signed deals with Disney and Hasbro.

So Andrew is basically an infomercial mogul. My correspondent says he's a super nice guy.



More updates and addenda, 13-14 May 2014:
Return to Oz...
Since I published my post yesterday, I've heard from a couple of people. I inserted a brief update in the body of the original post above (in green text), but here's more.


One person wrote to me:
The name of the [GIN member pushing the investment in the Oz movie] is John King. He is listed as one of the Co-Executive Producers. If gin people raised more than $1M I would be impressed. There were a bunch who invested, but gin wouldn't have had anything to do with it other than John pitching it to people he met there.
The movie may stink but I wouldn't hold any negativity toward it because of GIN.
Another friend, an ex-GIN member, wrote to me, also mentioning John King, who was the head of his local GIN chapter:
He is an executive producer on the film. ...I got to know him and his wife pretty well.

He never pitched the movie to any of the GIN folks in [our local] group, as far as I know.  And he and his wife seemed like pretty nice folks.

Apparently he was in great despair, with a failing career and marriage (this is public knowledge as he said it on stage), when he came across Your Wish Is Your Command.  He truly believes that GIN and KT turned his life around.  As far as I can tell, he is not simply a sociopath, nor do I think he sought any gain other then typical commissions and the chance to go "Hollywood."

There WAS misleading info.  On stage he implied that HE had raised 100 million for the film.
In a subsequent email my friend wrote:
...We were all impressed by his Platinum status and by the fact that he had raised millions of dollars as a venture capitalist, under the GIN rubric, to "make" a movie. One takes a person for their word, or should.  And words can mean everything and nothing.  When someone states, "we just raised the most money in the history of independent films, $100 million, I just got word as we were boarding the ship"... and if that person is someone whose house you had visited, and whose friendship you wanted, why wouldn't you trust them?
Why, indeed? Well, at least my friend wasn't suckered into investing in this lemon. What I find interesting is that according to THIS article (which I also linked to above), Summertime Entertainment says they spent only $70 mil on production, and the author of the piece speculated that they may have been exaggerating because "smaller production companies often inflate budgets to make a production appear more legitimate." So where did that other $30 mil or so go? Well, maybe to promotions and parties -- who knows. If I were a GINvestor, though, I'd be asking some serious questions rather than crowing about this bloated cartoon on their Facebook pages.

Anyhow, as far as I am concerned, the Whirled angles specifically in regard to the movie remain the same:

  1. Some GIN folk are taking undue credit for this flick
  2. It's a stinker -- so those who invested and are so GIN-proud of it probably won't see any decent ROI... meaning that once again GIN fell flat as a networking op.
In other words: I am not the one who spiked this insipid punch with GIN. Various GINfolk did this themselves.

Then there is the Marc J Lane connection, however tenuous it may be. As noted on my post, Marc was hugely instrumental in helping Katie structure GIN to hide money from the Feds. It's all there in the court docs. Marc was also an attorney for the production companies responsible for the Oz debacle -- and he even wrote a rebuttal on their behalf on Ripoff Report, threatening to sue the anonymous complainant for defamation. It could, of course, all just be a big fat coincidence.
Or it could be something as simple as a common hometown connection. Marc is a Chicago lawyer and Summertime Entertainment's Carroll brothers were born, raised, and went to school in the Windy City. Maybe they all knew each other from back in the day. As I said, I welcome insights from others.

By the way, the friend I quoted at length above also reminded me that a Trudeau entity called TruStar Productions, Inc. -- an enterprise in which Marc Lane was also involved -- had invested in a failed movie project called Hellbenders. It was noted in the Receiver's Third Report (17 March 2014), and I mentioned it on this blog post.

You can find a lot more about the Trudeau/Lane/TruStar relationship -- and their other business relationships -- in various court documents, such as Document #713 from Katie's civil case, filed on July 15, 2013, titled, "PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW." I've written about and inked to this before,
but here's a handy link on the receiver's web site.


For more, check out this link and the individual name links on Advanced Background Checks. 

Not surprisingly, on Marc's Wiki page there is no mention whatsoever of Trudeau or any of the Trudeau entities, or of Marc's involvement in this high-profile case. A shame, that, since Marc worked so hard on his client's behalf, including trying to get data under the Freedom of Information Act regarding some of the ongoing investigations of the various Katie companies. Here's some interesting correspondence from 2011 and 2012. It's in .txt format and you'll need to scroll down to the bottom and work your way up.
 
I have put all of this on my Whirled and have included links in order to raise legitimate questions and encourage others with more resources than I have to continue the investigations.

At any rate -- getting back to the current cinematic flop -- here are some more links. This one handily lists all the major folks involved in the Oz project:
http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/legends-of-oz-dorothys-return/5071489.article

Here is John King's Facebook page. He doesn't seem to be very active, except for a few nods to the Oz project, which currently dominates his cover photo and profile pic:
https://www.facebook.com/john.king.14019338

Here's John King's IMDB link, which links back to the IMDB page for the project: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6359182/

Here's John King's stik.com link:
http://www.stik.com/king_john2

And
here is a link to Elevate Entertainment, one of whose principals claims to have been involved with John's "110 million dollar private equity raise" for the Oz movie.
Natalie King - CEO
After graduating cum laude with a degree in Finance from Jacksonville University, Natalie moved to Los Angeles to work with Executive Producer Greg Centineo and Co-Executive Producer John King on a 110 million dollar private equity raise for an upcoming movie Franchise titled Legends of Oz - Dorothy’s return. It is set to be released worldwide in May 2014...

...Natalie enjoys bringing her analytical and creative side to develop powerful content that will reach a diverse audience.
But wait... there's more! Other peeps are claiming credit along with John King for raising some of those millions for the Oz thing. Here's one Franco Rosado, who describes himself as a "Youth Empowerment Specialist," on Linkedin:
Excited to be brokering our first motion picture deal with Mr. John King and Summertime Entertainment COMING SOON - MAY 9TH - OVER 3000 THEATERS LEGENDS OF OZ, DOROTHY RETURNS (3D Animation Film) MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! We raised the $5 million needed for our film! Stay tuned for more to come! Franco Rosado CEO, Deep Sea Innertainment Youth Empowerment Specialist [email and phone number redacted ~CC]
So I'm sure there's a whole tangled story here. I don't know much about the film biz, but what I do know is that many movies go through a long and sometimes contentious process in their journey to release. So no doubt there were a lot of the normal Hollywood egos and financial struggles, which ordinarily would not interest me all that much. But when there is even a marginal Scamworld connection --- when, in other words, it intersects with my beat in some way -- you can bet your last flying monkey that I will jump on it, especially if it's a slow news day.

By the way, here is the link to page 1 of what is currently a 15-page, five-and-a-half-year-long thread about the efforts to get people to invest in the Oz movie (I linked to a few pages in this thread above). http://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-818-909-6800.